FBI Releases New Images of the Suspect in the Brown University Shooting
It's About Time: Trump Has Designated This a Weapon of Mass Destruction
If These Three Words Dominate a News Presser, You Shouldn't Go on Television
We Have More Details on the Killing of Rob Reiner and His Wife...
Australia's Prime Minister Vows More Gun Restrictions After Terrorist Attack
What This Muslim Man Did During the Australia Shooting Will Shock You
House Republicans Just Dropped a Bombshell About DC Crime Rates
Australia Proves Gun Control Doesn't Work
Islamic Preacher Vows to Take Germany Back to the Stone Age
NBC News Stirs the 'Systemic Racism' Pot With Update on Once-Inaccessible Activities
From Anxiety to Alignment: What This Week’s Data Tells Us About the Right’s...
This Actress Had an Insane Meltdown Over Trump Calling a Reporter 'Piggy'
Sen. John Kennedy Mocks Jasmine Crockett’s Senate Bid: ‘The Voices in Her Head...
Chile Elects Trump-Style Conservative José Antonio Kast as President
Rabbi Killed in Antisemitic Terror Attack Had His Warnings Ignored by the Australian...
Tipsheet

Virginia High School Teacher Fired Over Religious Objections to Using Student's Preferred Pronouns

A teacher at West Point High School in Virginia was fired recently over his religious objections to using male pronouns when referring to a student who is biologically female but identifies as male.

Advertisement

The West Point School Board unanimously voted 5-0 Thursday to dismiss 47-year-old French teacher Peter Vlaming following a four-hour hearing. They argued that he was in “willful violation of school board policy.”

“We do not and cannot tolerate discrimination in any form, or actions that create a hostile environment for any member of our school family,” they said in a statement. “Mr. Vlaming was asked repeatedly, over several weeks and by multiple administrators, to address a student by the pronouns with which this student identifies. The issue before us was not one mistaken slip of the tongue. Mr. Vlaming consistently refused to comply going forward -- including in a statement made at the hearing -- a willful violation of school board policy.”

Vlaming cited his Christian faith and told his superiors that he was willing to use the student’s name and simply avoid using feminine pronouns but he says the school rejected that compromise.

"That discrimination then leads to creating a hostile learning environment. And the student had expressed that. The parent had expressed that," West Point schools Superintendent Laura Abel said regarding Vlaming's insistence on avoiding the student's preferred pronouns. "They felt disrespected."

Advertisement

However, some parents and students support Vlaming and there is a petition underway entitled “Don’t Terminate Mr. Vlaming” which has 2,632 supporters.

"I'm just outraged about it," Forrest Rohde, a West Point High School junior told WRIC. "He's a really nice guy, he wanted to do everything about his students. He really does care about his students. The thing he will not do is change his ways of thoughts and believing in things just to conform to someone else's ideologies."

"I see this stuff on the news far away from here," he added, "but when it hits close to home and someone's free speech is being violated, I have to step in and say something about it."

One parent pointed out that the school did not even have a specific policy in place in regard to the use of gender pronouns.

“If there’s no policy in place, how can they just let him go?” Jennifer Haynes, a 52-year-old West Point High parent, asked.

Vlaming's lawyer, Shawn Voyles, who noted this as well, argued that his client has constitutional rights.

Advertisement

"One of those rights that is not curtailed is to be free from being compelled to speak something that violates your conscience," he said.

As for Vlaming, he said that he respects the views of others and was just aiming for some “mutual tolerance.”

“That is not tolerance,” he said. “That is coercion.”

He is consulting with his attorney about appropriate legal action.

“I have to research how we would do that, what that would entail,” Vlaming said. “I do think it’s a serious question of First Amendment rights.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement