We're Living Rent Free in the Canadians' Heads
This CNN Host Addressed an Issue That Liberals DO NOT Want to Talk...
Kash Patel Celebrated With Team USA at the Winter Olympics. Was It a...
Someone Shouted the N-Word at the BAFTAs. It's Created a Total Fiasco on...
We Saw the Greatest Olympic Win Since 1980s Miracle on Ice...and the Libs...
Director of DC Dept of Environment Literally Wants to Infect You With E....
USA Hockey’s Gold Redeemed the Otherwise Awful Olympics
Tony Evers Just Sold Wisconsin Out to the World Health Organization
Goodbye, Chicago Bears
A Year of Healthcare Reform, Defined by Transparency
If Ever There Was a Moment for DHS and ICE to Be Fully...
The Quiet Monopoly Driving Your Healthcare Bill
The Canadian Cope Surrounding the Team USA Win Is Hilarious
Pressure Is Mounting Against Tony Gonzales. Will He Suspend His Campaign?
Mexican Special Forces Kill Mastermind Behind Cartel Terrorism Outbreak
Tipsheet

DOJ Argues Against Campus 'Free Speech Zone' Speech Restrictions

DOJ Argues Against Campus 'Free Speech Zone' Speech Restrictions

The Department of Justice filed a statement of interest Tuesday in the case of Kevin Shaw, a California student at Los Angeles Pierce College, who tried to hand out copies of the Constitution on campus and was told he was only allowed to do so in a small, designated, free speech zone after he obtained a permit. Shaw said the college’s system of applying for permits allows administrators unchecked authority to grant or deny permits.

Advertisement

Shaw’s lawsuit, filed last year, challenges the constitutionality of the school’s policies which effectively restrict free expression on campus to a 616 square-foot “Free Speech Area.”

“In order to use the Free Speech Area—which comprises approximately .003% of the campus—students must obtain prior authorization from campus officials by submitting a permit application,” the DOJ notes. “The College also maintains unpublished rules governing free speech, which students are not made aware of until they obtain a permit application.”

The DOJ argues in their brief that the college’s rules are an "unconstitutional prior restraint."

"First, they create an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech in the Free Speech Area," according to the brief. "Second, in all events, they are not valid time, place, and manner restrictions because they are not narrowly tailored and do not leave open ample alternative channels of communication."

“Mr. Shaw’s allegations, if proven,” they add, “demonstrate that Pierce College’s speech policies and practices, which the College applied to deny Mr. Shaw his right to engage in expressive activity in a public forum, imposed prior restraints that were not narrowly tailored to further a significant government interest and failed to provide other alternative channels of communications.”

Advertisement

The DOJ also argues that the problem is not limited to Pierce College.

“Free speech has come under attack on campuses across the country," the brief says. "Such failure is of grave concern because freedom of expression is ‘vital’ on campuses."

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement that “university officials and faculty must defend free expression boldly and unequivocally.”

“Last month, I promised a recommitment to free speech on campus and to ensuring First Amendment rights,” he said. “The Justice Department continues to do its part in defending free speech, protecting students’ free expression, and enforcing federal law.”

The DOJ filed another statement of interest last month in the case of a lawsuit against Georgia Gwinnett College. Chike Uzuegbunam, a student at the school, sued after he tried to talk to other students about his Christian faith and was restricted to two free speech zones. Even after he remained within the designated zone he was told to stop because the school believed his speech amounted to disorderly conduct.

Advertisement

The Justice Department argues that “the college’s speech policies were not content-neutral, established an impermissible heckler’s veto, and were not narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement