The Video Speaks for Itself, the ICE Agent Was Justified
The Moral Blackmailing of the American People
Venezuela Freed From 'The Warmth of Collectivism'
Should Capitalism Have Any Guardrails?
Minnesota Democrats Are Testing How Woke Is Too Woke
The Uncontainable Embers of Iran’s Uprising
When Reality Triumphs Over Self-Destructive Kakistocracy
Tragedy and Reality
Iran's Theocracy Enters Its Last Days
The Supreme Court and the Coming Showdown on Men in Women's Sports
Schools Must Teach the History of Socialism
Should the US Intervene to Help Iranian Revolutionaries?
Hospitals Fight Trump to Protect a Cash Cow
Minneapolis Public Schools Reportedly Offering Remote Learning Through Feb. 12 After ICE S...
DOJ Sues Two California Cities Over Natural Gas Ban in New Construction
Tipsheet

The Birthright Citizenship Debate is Officially on

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

UPDATE: The first legal ruling is in

Advertisement

***Original post***

On Monday President Donald Trump signed an executive order ending birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants.

"Among the categories of individuals born in the United States and not subject to the jurisdiction thereof, the privilege of United States citizenship does not automatically extend to persons born in the United States:  (1) when that person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when that person’s mother’s presence in the United States at the time of said person’s birth was lawful but temporary (such as, but not limited to, visiting the United States under the auspices of the Visa Waiver Program or visiting on a student, work, or tourist visa) and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth," the order states. 

The move immediately prompted a lawsuit from the ACLU and 22 Democrat state attorneys general. The 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." 

Advertisement

It was a strategy of the White House to push the executive order and prompt debate on the issue in the courts. The Trump administration argues, "That provision rightly repudiated the Supreme Court of the United States’s shameful decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), which misinterpreted the Constitution as permanently excluding people of African descent from eligibility for United States citizenship solely based on their race. But the Fourteenth Amendment has never been interpreted to extend citizenship universally to everyone born within the United States."  

Eventually, the case could be taken up by the Supreme Court and the current justices may have a different interpretations or come to a different conclusion about how the 14th amendment is defined. 

On Capitol Hill, Republican lawmakers introduced new legislation Tuesday to end birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants, noting it was never intended for foreigners who deliberately break the law. 

Advertisement

"

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos