CNN Had to Do Some Major Editorial Surgery on Their NYC IED Article...and...
This State Is About to End Government-Sponsored Kidnapping
Federal Judge Puts Another Snag in Trump Admin's Deportation Efforts
Trump Asked Major GOP Donors Who They Want to Succeed Him. This Is...
Tucker Carlson Makes Outrageous Claim About US Troops in Iran. Ted Cruz...
A Veteran Had No Family at His Funeral, So America Came Instead
IRS Docs Reveal Jennifer Siebel Newsom Reportedly Pocketed Millions From Her 'Gender Stere...
Report: Shots Fired at the U.S. Consulate in Toronto in 'National Security Incident'
The Left Has Transitioned Away From the Concept of Consent
Parents of Fallen US Soldiers in the Middle East Had One Message for...
Senator Thune Blasts Democrats for Failing at Basic Duties of Government As DHS...
Oil Price Crashes As President Trump Urges Tankers Into the Strait of Hormuz
President Trump Pledged to Stop Iran From Obtaining Nuclear Weapons in 2015. Now...
Secretary of War: Today Will Be Our Most Intense Day of Strikes in...
Drag Queen Staffs School Clinic, Explains Rebranding of 'Gender-Affirming' Care to Avoid F...
Tipsheet

Biden Is Trying to Cash in After His Attack on the Supreme Court

Biden Is Trying to Cash in After His Attack on the Supreme Court
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

After launching an unprecedented attack on the Supreme Court from the halls of the White House Monday night, President Joe Biden is fundraising off of making the bench a political target. 

Advertisement

"Today's decision by the Supreme Court removes virtually all limits on what the president can do. It's a dangerous precedent. I know I will respect the limits of the presidential powers, but any president -- including Donald Trump -- will now be free to ignore the law," a Biden campaign email declares. 

"I concur with Justice Sotomayor's dissent today. She said: 'In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law...with fear for our democracy, I dissent. 'So should the American people dissent? I dissent. I'm asking you to help save the America we know: An America in which presidents tell the truth, uphold the law, defend democracy, and protect our fundamental freedoms. Rush a $25 contribution for the sake of our country," the funding request continues. 

But there's just one big problem. The Supreme Court ruling granting presidents immunity for official acts specifically states that presidents are not above the law and that not all actions they take are official. 

“It is these enduring principles that guide our decision in this case. The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official. The President is not above the law. But Congress may not criminalize the President’s conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution. And the system of separated powers designed by the Framers has always demanded an energetic, independent Executive. The President therefore may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. That immunity applies equally to all occupants of the Oval Office, regardless of politics, policy, or party," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the 6-3 opinion

Advertisement

Related:

2024 ELECTION

"Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts. This case is the first criminal prosecution in our Nation’s history of a former President for actions taken during his Presidency. Determining whether and under what circumstances such a prosecution may proceed requires careful assessment of the scope of Presidential power under the Constitution. The nature of that power requires that a former President have some immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts during his tenure in office," the opinion continues. "At least with respect to the President’s exercise of his core constitutional powers, this immunity must be absolute. As for his remaining official actions, he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity."

Meanwhile, Democrats and their friends in the media are melting down over the decision -- with some musing about assassinations and vowing an impeachment of the Supreme Court. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos