Wait, Did Ilhan Omar Really Say That About Jewish Students?
So, Kristi Noem Killed Her Dog. Obama Still Ate One.
These Protests are the Result of Bad Parenting and an Education System Churning...
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 215: Jesus was Jewish - Fact not Opinion
Never Again. Except When Biden Voters Want To.
The Importance of the National Day of Prayer
Is Seeking God's Kingdom a Means to an End?
Venezuela: Socialism of the 21st Century
More God, More Peace
Pro-Hamas Protesters Book Room Across From WH Dinner, Fly Palestine Flag
One University's Warning to Entitled Students: 'Pro-Terrorism Protests Will Not Be Tolerat...
California Launches Fear-Mongering Pro-Abortion Ad in Pro-Life State
Pro-Hamas Protestors Show Up on Ted Cruz's Lawn
Dem Mayor Fights Recall Effort Following Laken Riley's Death
Columbia University Senate Accuses Shafik of Undermining Academic Freedom By Arresting Pro...
Tipsheet

Justice Jackson Says the 'Most Horrible Thing I've Ever Heard' About the First Amendment

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Murthy v. Missouri. At the center of the case is the federal government's coercing of social media companies to take down stories and content bureaucrats deemed "misinformation" during the COVID-19 pandemic. This type of censorship was repeatedly touted by the Biden White House. 

Advertisement

During arguments, liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson came to the defense of the government and expressed concern the case would limit federal power. 

Jackson's claims about the First Amendment didn't sit well with constitutional scholars, including Republican Senator Eric Schmitt. Schmitt brought the case against the Biden administration when he served as Missouri's attorney general.

Advertisement

The White House is refusing to comment on the case and whether officials are still in touch with social media companies about censoring information. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement