So What If Targeting Jerome Powell Is Politically Motivated?
A CNBC Host Delivered One Remark That Wrecked a Dem Senator's Entire Narrative...
Why Are So Many Leftists Such Trash?
Trump Finally Fixed the Food Pyramid
In Reelection Launch, Josh Shapiro Admits Violent Attack Almost Drove Him From the...
Will Eric Swalwell Be Killed Off the Ballot?
It Depends on Where You Stand
Something Doesn’t Add Up
America’s Choice: A Civil Society or Dangerous Insurrection!
Are You Being Baited Into Rage?
Dignity for Thee—Not for Me
Kids’ Winter Cure for Nature Deficit Disorder
Regime Change in Venezuela: Key to Global Advance of Democracy and Peace
Trump Imposes 'Immediate' Tariffs on Iranian Trade Partners As Anti-Regime Protests Grow
Meta Taps Trump Ally for High Level Job
Tipsheet

Justice Jackson Says the 'Most Horrible Thing I've Ever Heard' About the First Amendment

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Murthy v. Missouri. At the center of the case is the federal government's coercing of social media companies to take down stories and content bureaucrats deemed "misinformation" during the COVID-19 pandemic. This type of censorship was repeatedly touted by the Biden White House. 

Advertisement

During arguments, liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson came to the defense of the government and expressed concern the case would limit federal power. 

Jackson's claims about the First Amendment didn't sit well with constitutional scholars, including Republican Senator Eric Schmitt. Schmitt brought the case against the Biden administration when he served as Missouri's attorney general.

Advertisement

Related:

CENSORSHIP

The White House is refusing to comment on the case and whether officials are still in touch with social media companies about censoring information. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement