Let’s Have a Serious Conversation About Race
An American 250 Story
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 324: Proverbs Greatest Hits and the Guidance...
'Christian! Love Means You Let Us Sin All We Want to, and Pay...
What's in a Name?
'You Will Not Escape': DOJ Warns Ghost Fleet Operators After Tanker Captain's Guilty...
Trump Endorses Mike Collins Ahead of Georgia Senate Run-Off
So, About James Harden's Houston Arrest
A Celebration Not Everyone Welcomes?
Are Strong Families the Cure for America’s Mental Health Crisis?
Catholic Theologians Launch Bold Appeal for Israel Amid Rising Anti-Zionism
Is AI Humanity’s Path to Godhood?
Stop Telling Dads They're Optional
A Tent, a Knife, and the Usual Suspects
Veterans Earned Their Benefits and Shouldn’t Have to Fight to Access Them
Tipsheet

Justice Jackson Says the 'Most Horrible Thing I've Ever Heard' About the First Amendment

Justice Jackson Says the 'Most Horrible Thing I've Ever Heard' About the First Amendment
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Murthy v. Missouri. At the center of the case is the federal government's coercing of social media companies to take down stories and content bureaucrats deemed "misinformation" during the COVID-19 pandemic. This type of censorship was repeatedly touted by the Biden White House. 

Advertisement

During arguments, liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson came to the defense of the government and expressed concern the case would limit federal power. 

Jackson's claims about the First Amendment didn't sit well with constitutional scholars, including Republican Senator Eric Schmitt. Schmitt brought the case against the Biden administration when he served as Missouri's attorney general.

Advertisement

Related:

CENSORSHIP

The White House is refusing to comment on the case and whether officials are still in touch with social media companies about censoring information. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement