Are Buttigieg’s Latest Airline Rules Going to Get People Killed?
These Ugly, Little Schmucks Need to Face Consequences
Creator of the West Wing Blames This Person for January 6...And It's Not...
You Can't Be Shocked Over the Latest Terror Attack in Gaza
The Terrorists Are Running the Asylum
Columbia University Law Students Issue Demands of Their Own As Mob Rule Reigns
Lessons From Other Campus Protests
Have You Ever Heard Any Current Politician Use the Word 'Virtue'?
What's in a Hat? MAGA Hats and Pansies
Sweden: The Myth of Nordic Socialism
Continued Microsoft Cybersecurity Issues Warrant Close Examination
The Canary in the Coal Mine
Illegal Aliens Stand to Cash-In on Congressional Proposal to Increase the Additional Child...
Iran: The Growing Nuclear Threat
Several Anti-Israel Protestors Funded by George Soros
Tipsheet

Justice Jackson Says the 'Most Horrible Thing I've Ever Heard' About the First Amendment

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Murthy v. Missouri. At the center of the case is the federal government's coercing of social media companies to take down stories and content bureaucrats deemed "misinformation" during the COVID-19 pandemic. This type of censorship was repeatedly touted by the Biden White House. 

Advertisement

During arguments, liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson came to the defense of the government and expressed concern the case would limit federal power. 

Jackson's claims about the First Amendment didn't sit well with constitutional scholars, including Republican Senator Eric Schmitt. Schmitt brought the case against the Biden administration when he served as Missouri's attorney general.

Advertisement

The White House is refusing to comment on the case and whether officials are still in touch with social media companies about censoring information. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement