The Left’s War on Truth and How You Can Fight Back
The Greatest Legislative Fight for 2026 Is Upon Us. Who's Ready to Fix...
Here's the Anti-Trump FBI Agent Who Launched the Surveillance Probe of the Entire...
CNN Guest Gets Wrecked Over This Claim About the Minnesota ICE Shooting
Did You See This Epic Trip-Up by The New York Times Regarding Anti-Trump...
Wait, the Portland Police Chief Cried Over This?
So, That's the REAL Story Behind Top DOJ Attorneys Leaving Amid the Minneapolis...
Iran Uprisings Turn Deadlier as Regime Reportedly Targets the Wounded and Hospitals
U.S. Sees Net Negative Migration for the First Time in Decades
After Democrat Smears, Tom Homan Confirmed ICE Agent and Family Were Forced to...
This Is What's at Stake As SCOTUS Mulls the Issue of Men in...
The Left Will Never Give Up Global Warming
Watch: Woman Dragged Out of Car By ICE After Impeding Enforcement Operations in...
Like Two Ships Passing in the Night
In the End, Tyrannies Always Collapse
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Hands Down Huge Victory on School Choice

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Tuesday morning that government tuition assistance programs cannot discriminate against religious schools. The opinion is from Carson v. Makin, a case out of Maine. 

Advertisement

"Maine has enacted a program of tuition assistance for parents who live in school districts that do not operate a secondary school of their own. Under the program, parents designate the secondary school they would like their child to attend—public or private—and the school district transmits payments to that school to help defray the costs of tuition. Most private schools are eligible to receive the payments, so long as they are 'nonsectarian,'" the majority opinion, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, states. "The question presented is whether this restriction violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment."

"The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment protects against 'indirect coercion or penalties on the free exercise of religion, not just outright prohibitions,'" the opinion states. "A State’s antiestablishment interest does not justify enactments that exclude some members of the community from an otherwise generally available public benefit because of their religious exercise."

Advertisement

The ruling is being celebrated as a win for school choice.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos