Notice Anything Regarding All These Angry, Miserable White Liberal Women?
CNN's Top Legal Analyst Was Blunt About the Minnesota Dems' Outrageous Anti-ICE Lawsuit
Fox News' Greg Gutfeld Has an Exercise That Makes the 'Fake Empathy Liberal...Return...
About That Sonic Boom Weapon We Reportedly Deployed During Trump's Venezuela Raid...
Do You Think Liberals Know They're Wrong About the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis?
Is Trump Souring on Pam Bondi?
Dilbert Creator Scott Adams Has Died at 68
Here's the Insane Reason a U.K. Asylum Seeker Was Spared Jail Despite Sex...
Trump to Iran: Help Is on the Way
Flashback: There Was a Time Democrats Were Okay With Separating Illegal Immigrant Families
Trump Administration Makes Another Big Move to Deport Somalis
ICE, ICE Baby?
The Left Is So Desperate to Defend Their Minneapolis Narrative, They’ve Hit a...
A Chicago Man Was Brutally Attacked in the Loop. Guess How Many Times...
The December Inflation Report Is Here, and It's Good News
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Hands Down Huge Victory on School Choice

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Tuesday morning that government tuition assistance programs cannot discriminate against religious schools. The opinion is from Carson v. Makin, a case out of Maine. 

Advertisement

"Maine has enacted a program of tuition assistance for parents who live in school districts that do not operate a secondary school of their own. Under the program, parents designate the secondary school they would like their child to attend—public or private—and the school district transmits payments to that school to help defray the costs of tuition. Most private schools are eligible to receive the payments, so long as they are 'nonsectarian,'" the majority opinion, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, states. "The question presented is whether this restriction violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment."

"The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment protects against 'indirect coercion or penalties on the free exercise of religion, not just outright prohibitions,'" the opinion states. "A State’s antiestablishment interest does not justify enactments that exclude some members of the community from an otherwise generally available public benefit because of their religious exercise."

Advertisement

The ruling is being celebrated as a win for school choice.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement