The Lib Narrative About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting Took Another Brutal Hit
Reconciliation 2.0 Has Arrived
Here's the Anti-Trump FBI Agent Who Launched the Surveillance Probe of the Entire...
A CNN Guest Got Way Ahead of Her Skis Over This Claim About...
Tim Walz Just Did a Major Flip-Flop on This Minnesota U.S. Attorney
The Latest Update Out of Iran As Regime Attempts to Squash Uprising Will...
U.S. Sees Net Negative Migration for the First Time in Decades
After Democrat Smears, Tom Homan Confirmed ICE Agent and Family Were Forced to...
This Is What's at Stake As SCOTUS Mulls the Issue of Men in...
Cut Them Off NOW!
The Prime of Tough-Guy Progressivism
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Shrugs Off Assaults on ICE Agents: They Are Standing...
ACLU Lawyer Stumped When Justice Alito Asks for the Definition of Man and...
Watch: Woman Dragged Out of Car by ICE After Impeding Enforcement Operations in...
Time to Crack Down on Fraud
Tipsheet

SCOTUS Agrees to Hear a Landmark Second Amendment Case

AP Photo/Seth Perlman, File

After a decade long hiatus, the Supreme Court has finally agreed to hear a landmark Second Amendment case. 

Advertisement

Cam Edwards over at Bearing Arms has more:

For over a month now, the Court had been considering whether or not to accept a challenge to New York’s concealed carry licensing laws, but in the meantime SCOTUS has turned away several other cases dealing with the right to keep and bear arms. Many gun owners had been growing increasingly frustrated with what they see as the Court’s reluctance to address the issue, even with what’s supposed to be a solid majority in favor of protecting the right to both keep and bear arms.

That frustration has likely turned to elation for many of those gun owners, with the Court accepting the case today and determining that it will decide the question of “whether the State’s denial of petitioners’ applications for concealed-carry licenses for self-defense violated the Second Amendment.”

That question is worded slightly different than the one posed by the plaintiffs, which asked the Court to decide “whether the Second Amendment allows the government to prohibit ordinary law-abiding citizens from carrying handguns outside the home for self-defense,” but the core question still remains: are the rights of average, everyday citizens violated by the state’s discretionary “may issue” laws that don’t recognize self-defense as a valid reason to carry.

Advertisement

Last year more than 8 million Americans became new gun owners, citing self defense as the main reason they decided to purchase their first firearm.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos