The Democrats' Witch-Hunt Against Conservatives Just Ramped Up
Rashida Tlaib's Meltdown Over 'Death of America' Chants Begs a Key Question
The First Black Swan
John Fetterman Has Another Encounter With Pro-Palestinian Protesters
Some of the Reactions to O.J. Simpson's Death Were Wild
OJ's Death Permits Racism
What it Takes to be a Good Black Politician or Pundit
Rand Paul Promises to Drop the Veil On the 'Great COVID Cover-Up'
The Importance of US-Iraq Relations
Crippling Cyberattack Brings U.S. HealthCare System to a Halt
Trans Activists On The Wrong Side of History
The America First Approach Offers HOPE, Support for Women and Children
The Empire Strikes Again – in Ethiopia
The Threat of Modern School Counselors in Public School
Trump Snaps At Hostile Reporter Who Questioned His Abortion Stance

Pelosi Moves to Limit President Trump's Ability to Protect America From Iranian Terrorists

(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi isn't just condemning President Trump's decision to (rightfully) take out Iranian terrorist leader Qassem Soleimani, she's submitting a resolution to tie his hands in the future. In other words, she's attempting to limit President Trump's ability to protect Americans, at home and abroad, from Iranian terrorists planning lethal attacks. 


"Last week, the Trump Administration conducted a provocative and disproportionate military airstrike targeting high-level Iranian military officials," Pelosi wrote in a letter to her Democrat colleagues, falsely painting Iran as the victim of U.S. aggression. "This week, the House will introduce and vote on a War Powers Resolution to limit the President' military actions regarding Iran. This resolution is silmar to the resolution introduced by Senate Tim Kaine in the Senate. It reasserts Congress's long-established oversight responsibilities by mandating that if no further Congressional action is taken, the Administration's military hostilities with regard to Iran cease within 30 days." 

President Trump's decision to take out Soleimani, along with Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, was a defensive action against an imminent threat in the aftermath of a U.S. Embassy attack in Baghdad. Considering Soleimani's plans to launch attacks throughout Syria, Lebanon and Iraq against American targets, the strike was proportional. From Reuters

In mid-October, Iranian Major-General Qassem Soleimani met with his Iraqi Shi’ite militia allies at a villa on the banks of the Tigris River, looking across at the U.S. embassy complex in Baghdad.

The Revolutionary Guards commander instructed his top ally in Iraq, Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, and other powerful militia leaders to step up attacks on U.S. targets in the country using sophisticated new weapons provided by Iran, two militia commanders and two security sources briefed on the gathering told Reuters.

Two weeks before the October meeting, Soleimani ordered Iranian Revolutionary Guards to move more sophisticated weapons - such as Katyusha rockets and shoulder-fired missiles that could bring down helicopters - to Iraq through two border crossings, the militia commanders and Iraqi security sources told Reuters.

At the Baghdad villa, Soleimani told the assembled commanders to form a new militia group of low-profile paramilitaries - unknown to the United States - who could carry out rocket attacks on Americans housed at Iraqi military bases.


While Pelosi and her counterpart in the Senate, Chuck Schumer, continue to whine about not being briefed before the airstrike, current and former members of Congress with real Iran experience are  explaining why congressional authorization wasn't necessary. 

With Republicans in control of the Senate, the resolution will go nowhere. 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos