Don’t Panic About Trump’s Iran Strategy Just Yet
If You Missed Last Night's NBA Finals Game, You Missed Absolute Cinema
The Truth Is Simple: Democrats Don’t Care About Anything but Gaining Power
Here Is Leftist Government
The 60 Minutes Controversy
The War No One Else Is Fighting
Trump Goes to the NBA Finals — Look Who Attacked Him
Who'll Stop the Fraud?
A Villainous Blueprint for Managed Poverty
Donald Trump Is Personally Making Antitrust Sane Again
When Abortion Has a Face
Washington's Debt Problem Is Every Investor's Problem
The GOP's Quiet Rebellion: What It Means for Trump, Congress and the Supreme...
Nine Convicted in Ohio Drug Ring That Mixed Fentanyl Trafficking With $4.5M COVID-19...
Democrat Calls Republicans Fascists, Wishes He Could 'Run Over' Trump at Congressional Bas...
Tipsheet

Of Course: Obama Says Israel Speech "Misrepresented"

Of Course: Obama Says Israel Speech "Misrepresented"

As fallout continues over President Obama's calls for Israel to go back to its 1967 borders last week, Obama, as usual, is claiming his speech was "misrepresented."

Advertisement

Claiming his remarks earlier this week on borders for Israel and a future Palestinian state had been misrepresented, President Obama said Sunday that "1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps" means the two sides will "negotiate a border that is different than the one that existed on June 4, 1967."

In remarks Sunday to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the president tried to explain his earlier position to a warm but occasionally tentative crowd by saying that his speech Thursday at the State Department didn't offer anything new or provocative in the way of peace negotiations.

"There was nothing particularly original in my proposal; this basic framework for negotiations has long been the basis for discussions among the parties, including previous U.S. administrations," he said

"What I did on Thursday was to say publicly what has long been acknowledged privately," he added, saying his remarks were no different than a "well-known formula" that has been worked on for a generation.

"It allows the parties themselves to account for the changes that have taken place over the last 44 years, including the new demographic realities on the ground and the needs of both sides. The ultimate goal is two states for two peoples. Israel as a Jewish state and the homeland for the Jewish people, and the state of Palestine as the homeland for the Palestinian people; each state enjoying self-determination, mutual recognition, and peace," he said.

Since Thursday, tensions between the U.S. and Israel have been sharper than ever. The remarks -- in which the president said he wants Israel and the Palestinians to negotiate a land deal that starts with the 1967 borders -- received considerable criticism, including a public dressing down by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Advertisement

It seems that the President of the United States shouldn't have to "clarify" remarks given in a major foreign policy speech, yet over and over again we see this Administration clarifying controversial remarks when issues get heated.

Taking into account Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's response to the calls for 1967 borders, it was quite clear what message President Obama sent to the Jewish State last week. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement