Federal Judge Shuts Down TN Dems Over New Congressional Map
Senate Parliamentarian Just Delivered Some Brutal News About the Reconciliation Package
These Students Want to Cancel a Speaker for Not Being Part of Their...
Nicholas Kristof's Motte-and-Bailey Fallacy
The NY Times Continues Flailing Over Kristof's Column; Politico Warns Democrats Might Turn...
Georgia Pro-Gun Bill's Veto Doesn't Mean What Anti-Gunners Seem to Think
We Now Know Why Brigitte Macron Slapped the French President Last Year
Man Convicted of Running Chinese Police Station in Manhattan's Chinatown
FBI Offers $200K Reward for Former Air Force Agent Who Defected to Iran
Utah Podiatrist, Two Nurses Indicted in $29M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Florida Jury Convicts HealthSplash Founder in $1 Billion Medicare Fraud Scheme
U.S. Supreme Court Temporarily Restores Nationwide Mail Access to Abortion Pill
Mexican National Sentenced to 11 Years for Running Major U.S.-Mexico Border Smuggling Oper...
2018 West MI Woman of the Year Sentenced for Allegedly Stealing $1.4M Meant...
Trump Has the Cards for an AI Deal With China
Tipsheet

By the Numbers: Who Did Wall Street Buy in 2008?

By the Numbers: Who Did Wall Street Buy in 2008?

Amid the jumble of contradictory, foolish, and entirely nonsensical sentiments bubbling up at Occupy Wall Street, one clearly rises above the rest: Wall Street is evil. Corporations suck. They need to keep their money out of politics and stop corrupting our elected officials.

Advertisement

And while some of these protesters understand that Obama, the man they elected to the highest office in the land in 2008, is the real puppet of Wall Street, some of them still need a lesson in that math subject Obama claims to love so much.

Take, for example, the gentleman I spoke to at Occupy DC last Thursday. While waving his anti-Goldman Sachs sign and proclaiming himself, "anti-Big Bank USA," yet pro-Obama, he couldn't tell me who donated the most money to Obama's presidential campaign.

Happy to oblige, I produced a list of the top donors to Obama and McCain's campaigns--and if you're an "anti-Big Bank USA" Obama supporter, you sure as heck won't like his numbers. Below, you will see a comparison between Obama and McCain's top twenty campaign contributors:

Photobucket

Some highlights:

  • In blue, at the top, you see Obama's top contribution, $1,648,685 from the University of California. McCain's top contribution, in red, was $375,895 from Merrill Lynch. The sum of McCain's top five donations ($1,569,799) does not even add up to Obama's single highest contribution.
  • McCain's top donation was $375,895. Of Obama's entire top twenty contributions, not a single one is under half a million dollars.
  • Lehman Brothers and Bank of America, in green, are on McCain's top twenty list. They did not make Obama's. However, Obama received more money from both banks. Neither of those contributions were used in the total sum at the bottom.
  • The contributions in orange, green, and red are all from Wall Street. Five of Obama's top twenty contributors were from Wall Street, while McCain had eleven. However, those five banks alone contributed $3,603,495, while McCain's eleven banks contributed $2,604,890. And keep in mind that more than just those five banks donated to Obama; they were just the only ones who donated over half a million dollars to him.
  • In total, Obama's top twenty contributors gave him $13,382,825, while McCain's gave him $4,034,622--meaning Obama had a $9,348,203 advantage.
Advertisement

Some review questions for you: Who did Wall Street buy in 2008? Who would have been more hurt by restrictions on corporate donors? Which party has corporate interests at heart?

The numbers say it all. Class dismissed.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement