Australia Is What Happens When You Disarm Your Citizens
Oh, We Know What the Brown University Shooter Reportedly Said Before Opening Fire
To the Shock of No One, Australian PM Says Bondi Terrorists Motivated by...
If You Were Hoping That Trump Would Tone Down His Remarks on Rob...
Nice Try, Dems, But Your Little Stunt Against Kristi Noem Last Week Imploded...
When One Seeks Updates on the Brown University Shooting, It Shouldn't Devolve Like...
Watch a Reporter Call Out the Authorities During the Last Brown University Shooting...
It’s Not Hard to NOT Be a Jerk
The November Jobs Numbers Are Here, and It's Good News for American Workers
The Left Pivots Away From 'Islamophobia' With New Euphemism for People Who Notice...
USA Today Journalist Doubles Down on 'Appeal to Heaven' Ignorance
After Failing to Engage Bondi Beach Terrorists, Guess Who the Australian Police Did...
This Is What 'Globalize the Intifada' Looks Like: Orthodox Jews Attacked on NYC...
The U.S. Just Conducted Another Lethal Kinetic Strike on Narco Boats
The (Non-Christmas) Lists
Tipsheet

By the Numbers: Who Did Wall Street Buy in 2008?

Amid the jumble of contradictory, foolish, and entirely nonsensical sentiments bubbling up at Occupy Wall Street, one clearly rises above the rest: Wall Street is evil. Corporations suck. They need to keep their money out of politics and stop corrupting our elected officials.

Advertisement

And while some of these protesters understand that Obama, the man they elected to the highest office in the land in 2008, is the real puppet of Wall Street, some of them still need a lesson in that math subject Obama claims to love so much.

Take, for example, the gentleman I spoke to at Occupy DC last Thursday. While waving his anti-Goldman Sachs sign and proclaiming himself, "anti-Big Bank USA," yet pro-Obama, he couldn't tell me who donated the most money to Obama's presidential campaign.

Happy to oblige, I produced a list of the top donors to Obama and McCain's campaigns--and if you're an "anti-Big Bank USA" Obama supporter, you sure as heck won't like his numbers. Below, you will see a comparison between Obama and McCain's top twenty campaign contributors:

Photobucket

Some highlights:

  • In blue, at the top, you see Obama's top contribution, $1,648,685 from the University of California. McCain's top contribution, in red, was $375,895 from Merrill Lynch. The sum of McCain's top five donations ($1,569,799) does not even add up to Obama's single highest contribution.
  • McCain's top donation was $375,895. Of Obama's entire top twenty contributions, not a single one is under half a million dollars.
  • Lehman Brothers and Bank of America, in green, are on McCain's top twenty list. They did not make Obama's. However, Obama received more money from both banks. Neither of those contributions were used in the total sum at the bottom.
  • The contributions in orange, green, and red are all from Wall Street. Five of Obama's top twenty contributors were from Wall Street, while McCain had eleven. However, those five banks alone contributed $3,603,495, while McCain's eleven banks contributed $2,604,890. And keep in mind that more than just those five banks donated to Obama; they were just the only ones who donated over half a million dollars to him.
  • In total, Obama's top twenty contributors gave him $13,382,825, while McCain's gave him $4,034,622--meaning Obama had a $9,348,203 advantage.
Advertisement

Some review questions for you: Who did Wall Street buy in 2008? Who would have been more hurt by restrictions on corporate donors? Which party has corporate interests at heart?

The numbers say it all. Class dismissed.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos