Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
From FBI Whistleblowers to Defunding Planned Parenthood—and Everything in Between: A Year...
Christmas, Family, and the Cost of Saying ‘No’ to Trans Ideology
Trump’s DHS Pays Illegal Immigrants to Leave — Critics Ignore the Cost of...
BREAKING: President Trump Announces Christmas Day Airstrikes on ISIS in Nigeria
Adam Kinzinger Took Revenge on CBS Over 60 Minutes Drama. There's Just One...
The Miseducation of America
What, Exactly, Does the Right Stand For?
Made in the U.S.A.
Nicki Minaj Faces Massive Backlash After Pro-Trump, Pro-Christian Speech at AmericaFest
Hunter Biden's Still Lying: 'There Is No Laptop'
The Best and Worst of 2025
Tucker Carlson: A Christian Kufir Promoting Islam
This Democrat is Trying to Rip Trump's Name From an Iconic Building
Justice Department Challenges Illinois Laws It Says Endanger Federal Agents
Tipsheet

NYT Columnist Says Homeowners Should Get This For Protection Instead of Firearms

AP Photo/Jae C. Hong

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof posited the idea in a recent piece that people who are worried about people breaking into their homes should get bear spray for self-defense instead of a firearm.

Advertisement

Kristof wrote about the idea after home shootings involving Ralph Yarl and Kaylin Gillis.

Elsewhere, brutes send their victims to the E.R.; in America, they send them to their graves. Foreigners admire our popular culture, our technology, our lifestyle, but are bewildered by our refusal to rein in guns. 

In the 1990s when I was Tokyo bureau chief of The Times, Japanese people regularly spoke to me about a 1992 incident in which a 16-year-old Japanese exchange student, Yoshihiro Hattori, was shot dead in Louisiana after knocking on the wrong door. The homeowner said he thought the boy was a burglar and ordered him to 'freeze'; Hattori perhaps didn’t understand 'freeze' or misheard the man as saying 'please.' In any case, the boy moved, and the man shot him with a .44 magnum.

 "I backpack, and it's well known that bear spray is more effective against a charging grizzly than a handgun. Probably also more effective against a home invader. Think of it as harm reduction," he tweeted.

Advertisement

Related:

LAW AND ORDER

"We accept inconveniences to reduce auto fatalities: seatbelts, speed limits, no riding in the backs of pickup trucks. So why don't we accept tradeoffs to reduce gun mortality? In MS, it's easier to buy an AR-15 than to adopt a Chihuahua. Why should that be?" he further tweeted.

Kristof was predictably mocked for the idea of using bear mace:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement