Hillary Clinton's Remarks on the Electoral College Only Shows She Cannot Get Over...
Black Radio Host Dropped a Sound Take About the Knicks Going to the...
Nonprofit Launches Ad Blitz That Torches Canada and Mexico for 'Abusing' Major Trade...
There's Been an Update in the Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping. It's Not Good.
It's America's 250th Birthday, So We're in for a Deluge of Leftist Drivel
How Democrats Sell Themselves to the Public
Ghost of Alexis de Tocqueville Returns — What America Can Learn From Him
Who's to Blame for the Inner-City Mess?
Democrats Declare War on School Choice
The Humble Patent
The Left's Worst Political Miscalculation
Americans Should Welcome Legitimate Investigations Into Alleged Voter Registration Fraud
A Letter Home From Woke Summer Camp
The Big Apple Is Ripe for Rotten Democratic Socialism
America's Christian Revival Won’t Be Found at a 'Catholic' LGBT Conference
Tipsheet

NYT Columnist Says Homeowners Should Get This For Protection Instead of Firearms

NYT Columnist Says Homeowners Should Get This For Protection Instead of Firearms
AP Photo/Jae C. Hong

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof posited the idea in a recent piece that people who are worried about people breaking into their homes should get bear spray for self-defense instead of a firearm.

Advertisement

Kristof wrote about the idea after home shootings involving Ralph Yarl and Kaylin Gillis.

Elsewhere, brutes send their victims to the E.R.; in America, they send them to their graves. Foreigners admire our popular culture, our technology, our lifestyle, but are bewildered by our refusal to rein in guns. 

In the 1990s when I was Tokyo bureau chief of The Times, Japanese people regularly spoke to me about a 1992 incident in which a 16-year-old Japanese exchange student, Yoshihiro Hattori, was shot dead in Louisiana after knocking on the wrong door. The homeowner said he thought the boy was a burglar and ordered him to 'freeze'; Hattori perhaps didn’t understand 'freeze' or misheard the man as saying 'please.' In any case, the boy moved, and the man shot him with a .44 magnum.

 "I backpack, and it's well known that bear spray is more effective against a charging grizzly than a handgun. Probably also more effective against a home invader. Think of it as harm reduction," he tweeted.

Advertisement

Related:

LAW AND ORDER

"We accept inconveniences to reduce auto fatalities: seatbelts, speed limits, no riding in the backs of pickup trucks. So why don't we accept tradeoffs to reduce gun mortality? In MS, it's easier to buy an AR-15 than to adopt a Chihuahua. Why should that be?" he further tweeted.

Kristof was predictably mocked for the idea of using bear mace:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement