Gavin Newsom’s Former Chief of Staff Cops to Massive Fraud, Tax Scam, and...
Chinese President Makes Huge Promise to Trump
As Gavin Newsom Touts CA's Education Spending, Spot What He Doesn't Brag About
If Democrats Care About 'Black Representation,' Why Are They Silent About Frederica Wilson...
Variety Gets Wrecked for Attacking Critics of the 'Diverse' Cast of Nolan's Odyssey
Democrats Khanna and Tlaib Sponsor Resolution That Backs Global Anti-Israel 'Nakba 78' Pro...
America Has a Serious Literacy Problem on Its Hands
President Trump Bids Farewell to China
The NYPD Is Investigating Another Antisemitic Incident at NYU
Why It’s Time to Disown Tucker and Megyn
Judge Sues Illinois Supreme Court for Unconstitutional Dismissal, Violation of Free Speech...
Here's How Seriously the US Took Digital Security on President Trump's Trip to...
Nithya Raman Wants to Ban What? See Her Latest Proposed Fire Prevention Policy
Chaos in Beijing: Secret Service, American Reporters Clash With Chinese Security During Tr...
The Biden Administration Is to Blame for Spirit’s Demise
Tipsheet

Even WaPo's Legal Experts Admit the Obvious About Protests At SCOTUS Justices' Homes

Even WaPo's Legal Experts Admit the Obvious About Protests At SCOTUS Justices' Homes
AP Photo/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades

Pro-abortion protests outside the homes of the conservative Supreme Court justices have increased in recent days after the court appears to be ready to overturn Roe v. Wade despite there being a federal law prohibiting protests outside the homes of judges.

Advertisement

Passed in 1950, 18 U.S. Code § 1507 states:

"Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

The Washington Post reached out to protest law experts who said the past and planned protests are in violation of the law:

"Tabatha Abu El-Haj, an expert on protest rights at Drexel University’s law school, said that the current protests at justices’ homes qualify under the statute and that the statute, if tested, would likely be found constitutional. "'The statute would seem to apply both because … they appear to be picketing and parading with the relevant intent and at the relevant locations,' Abu El-Haj said, 'but also because the statute has a catch-all ‘resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence.'" 

"Timothy Zick of the College of William & Mary agreed. 'The conduct appears to be within the statute’s prohibition,'" Zick said. 'Picketing includes activities such as demonstrating and protesting. The court has upheld properly tailored restrictions on pickets that target a particular home.'"

Advertisement

Related:

ROE V. WADE

The homes of Chief Justice John Roberts, Justices Brett Kavanaugh, and Samuel Alito have been targeted in recent days with more protests at theirs and other conservative justices' homes planned.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos