The Left’s War on Truth and How You Can Fight Back
The Warmth of Collectivism
Remember When Following the Science Was Required Because It Was Settled? Well, the...
Chicago Kids Can’t Read. The Chicago Teachers' Union Can’t Spell.
The Left Will Never Give Up Global Warming
Like Two Ships Passing in the Night
Did You See the NYT Piece About the Death of Scott Adams?
Shameless Ilhan Omar Accuses Trump of Wasting Taxpayer Dollars
No Compromise on the Hyde Amendment
Traditional Families and American Prosperity
In the End, Tyrannies Always Collapse
Iran Past, Present, and Future: A Conversation With Marziyeh Amirizadeh, Part 1
Trump’s Right to Target Private Equity
When Washington Picks Winners, Innovation Loses
Minnesota House Moves to Impeach Tim Walz
Tipsheet

AG Garland Just Made It Easier for Immigrants with Criminal Histories to Claim Asylum

Michael Reynolds/Pool via AP

Attorney General Merrick Garland has made it easier for immigrants who commit crimes while in the U.S. to not be deported after he ruled on Monday that immigration judges must take into the person's mental health when they claim asylum.

Advertisement

According to Fox News, Garland's directive was the result of reviewing the case of a Mexican national convicted in April 2017 of burglary in New Jersey and sentenced to four years in prison. He wanted to block his deportation by claiming he would be persecuted because of his sexual orientation and mental health condition if deported to Mexico.

An immigrant judge first dismissed the application while not taking the man's mental health into account and an appeal resulted in the same ruling. After the Garland requested to review the case in December, he said on Monday, "I have determined that it is appropriate to overrule the Board’s decision in G-G-S."

Garland pointed to another case where a domestic violence victim was convicted of assaulting their abuser and that assault was influenced by post-traumatic stress disorder.

"In some circumstances, a respondent’s mental health condition may indicate that the respondent does not pose a danger to the community," he said, adding, "Of course, an individual may pose a danger to the community notwithstanding a mental health condition, and in those cases, the ‘particularly serious crime’ bar to asylum and withholding of removal may apply. But the potential relevance of mental health evidence to the dangerousness inquiry suffices to establish that such evidence should not categorically be disregarded, as G-G-S- held."

Advertisement

"Going forward, immigration adjudicators may consider a respondent’s mental health in determining whether a respondent, having been convicted by a final judgment of a particularly serious crime, constitutes a danger to the community of the United States."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement