An Obama-Appointed Judge Might Have Delivered a Huge Blow to Dems' Anti-Voter ID...
Wait, That's Why a Finnish MP Got Convicted of Hate Speech
The Reactions to Tiger Woods' Latest Car Crash Are Pretty Funny (He's Fine)
How Do You Think People Reacted When HBO Announced Snape Would Be Black...
Spain Failed a Young Woman, Then It Euthanized Her, Proving Government Does Not...
Normalizing Deviant and Unhealthy Behavior
Maryland’s 'Equal Opportunity' Bill Targets Private Education
Telemedicine CEO Pleads Guilty to $46.2M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Tom Homan Just Destroyed the Senate for Leaving These ICE Heroes Out to...
Distance, Perspective, and the Weight of America
The Real Toxic Masculinity: The Hidden, Chemical Crisis Destroying American Manhood
Freedom and Capitalism Will Save Cuba
Democrats Push Marijuana to Spread Dependency
Harmeet Dhillon Is an Exceptional Choice to Lead Civil Rights Division
The EV Bubble Is About to Burst
Tipsheet

Georgetown Law Professor Justifies Far-Left Mobs Targeting Supreme Court Justices' Homes

Georgetown Law Professor Justifies Far-Left Mobs Targeting Supreme Court Justices' Homes
AP Photo/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades

A law professor at Georgetown University defended pro-abortion protesters showing up to the homes of the Supreme Court justices who appear to have voted in favor to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement

Pro-abortion protesters showed up to the homes of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh to pressure them to not overturn the landmark decision that prevents states from making their own laws on abortions.

Josh Chafetz has since locked his Twitter account after substantial backlash, but the initial tweet stated: "The 'protest at the Supreme Court, not at the justices' houses' line would be more persuasive if the Court hadn't this week erected fencing to prevent protesters from coming anywhere near it." 

Chafetz then followed up his take with the following: "And before the 'oh so you support J6 lmao!" trolls show up: the difference is *substantive*. When mobs is right, some (but not all!) more aggressive tactics are justified. When not, not."

Advertisement

Related:

ROE V. WADE

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement