Gavin Newsom Funded an NGO That Brings HIV-Positive 'Migrants' to America
Anti-ICE Protesters Are Stalking Federal Employees in Minneapolis
Newsweek Runs Headline on Story It Calls Unverified, and the Press Dumping on...
'They Just Care About Power.' Scott Jennings Lays Out What Virginia Redistricting Was...
California Sees Drop in Homicides. There's A Reason for That and Leftists Won't...
Vivek Ramaswamy Slams Critique of Israeli Aid and Some People's Odd Obsession With...
A Virginia Circuit Court Has Just Ruled The State's New Congressional Map Unconstitutional
Here's Why The Situation In Iran is Looking Disastrous For China
Pennsylvania Woman Accused of Selling Pandemic Unemployment Approvals to Ineligible Claima...
New York Times Podcast Calls Shoplifting 'Political Protest' and Defends the Killing of...
Trump's Chief of Staff Reportedly Tells Cabinet Members to Focus on Domestic Issues...
High-Tech Car Thieves Used Key Fob Devices to Steal Over 130 Vehicles, Feds...
Navy Secretary Phelan Exits Administration Immediately, Is Replaced With Hung Cao
DOJ Files Complaint Against DC Water Over 200-Million-Gallon Sewage Spill into Potomac Riv...
Five Romanians Charged in $1M Scheme to Steal SNAP Benefits From Low-Income Families...
Tipsheet

Georgetown Law Professor Justifies Far-Left Mobs Targeting Supreme Court Justices' Homes

Georgetown Law Professor Justifies Far-Left Mobs Targeting Supreme Court Justices' Homes
AP Photo/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades

A law professor at Georgetown University defended pro-abortion protesters showing up to the homes of the Supreme Court justices who appear to have voted in favor to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement

Pro-abortion protesters showed up to the homes of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh to pressure them to not overturn the landmark decision that prevents states from making their own laws on abortions.

Josh Chafetz has since locked his Twitter account after substantial backlash, but the initial tweet stated: "The 'protest at the Supreme Court, not at the justices' houses' line would be more persuasive if the Court hadn't this week erected fencing to prevent protesters from coming anywhere near it." 

Chafetz then followed up his take with the following: "And before the 'oh so you support J6 lmao!" trolls show up: the difference is *substantive*. When mobs is right, some (but not all!) more aggressive tactics are justified. When not, not."

Advertisement

Related:

ROE V. WADE

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement