Good Riddance to the Awful Thomas Massie
Why the CIA Was Not Pleased With Yesterday's COVID Whistleblower Hearing
UK's Labour Party Got Brutalized in Recent Local Elections...and Many Want Keir Starmer...
Hakeem Jeffries Had a Total Meltdown Yesterday
There Could Be One Fewer Panican Republican in the Senate Soon
A Hollywood Director Claims 'No Group Is Worse’ Than These People
President Trump Celebrates Successful Meetings, Future Cooperation With China in State Din...
Here Are Some Details of President Trump's Meeting With China's Xi Jinping
Rep. Wesley Hunt Shuts Down Democrats' Shameful 'Jim Crow' Talk
'A Slap in the Face:' Guess Where Zohran Mamdani Made Cuts to NYC's...
AOC, Ice Cream, and Veggies
Feeding the Government Pig
Victims Everywhere
Sanders Invites China’s AI Czars to Washington—and Waves the Flag of AI Surrender
James Blair's Victory
Tipsheet

Georgetown Law Professor Justifies Far-Left Mobs Targeting Supreme Court Justices' Homes

Georgetown Law Professor Justifies Far-Left Mobs Targeting Supreme Court Justices' Homes
AP Photo/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades

A law professor at Georgetown University defended pro-abortion protesters showing up to the homes of the Supreme Court justices who appear to have voted in favor to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement

Pro-abortion protesters showed up to the homes of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh to pressure them to not overturn the landmark decision that prevents states from making their own laws on abortions.

Josh Chafetz has since locked his Twitter account after substantial backlash, but the initial tweet stated: "The 'protest at the Supreme Court, not at the justices' houses' line would be more persuasive if the Court hadn't this week erected fencing to prevent protesters from coming anywhere near it." 

Chafetz then followed up his take with the following: "And before the 'oh so you support J6 lmao!" trolls show up: the difference is *substantive*. When mobs is right, some (but not all!) more aggressive tactics are justified. When not, not."

Advertisement

Related:

ROE V. WADE

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement