Joe Biden's Weird, Failure-Filled Presidency Is Finally Dead
Axios Has a Damning Story About Kamala Harris. It's Why People Likely Doubt...
Democrats Are Owned By Rich Donors
The Secret Service's Day Of Reckoning: What Kim Cheatle's Evasion Means For America
The Soviet Playbook to Dismantle Christianity & Take Over Culture
The Most Important 42 Miles in American Politics
Where Does Joe Biden Rank Among America's Worst Presidents?
Biden's Withdrawal Doesn't Mean Harris Automatically Succeeds Him
How Can They Stay With Her, How Can They Dump Her?
An Inside Track For Mike Carey if Vance Moves on to VP
His Fight for Our Lives
Kamala Harris: Climate Alarmist, Energy Luddite
Operation Boomerang
Harris Is Biden 2.0 or Worse
With Biden Out of the Race, Sen. Schmitt Calls for Using the 25th...

Democrat's Talk More Tax Increases

One of the first tasks the new chairman of the Ways & Means Committee, Charlie Rangel, has stated he will undertake this Congress is to reform the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). The tax originated in 1969 to make sure a few hundred taxpayers with high incomes were not able to avoid income taxes through aggressive use of tax deductions. Thirty-eight years later, the tax is now targeting over 25 million taxpayers and it's growing.
I find Chairman Rangel's interest and sudden desire to fix the AMT to be quite ironic, especially since for the past 15 years, he and his Democratic colleagues have either been supporting policies that expand the AMT's reach or been obstructing Republican efforts to eliminate it. Just take a look below at their historical record on the matter:
  • In 1993, the last time the Democrat's controlled the House, Senate, and Presidency, they raised the AMT rate from 24 percent to a dual rate structure of 26 and 28 percent, and on top of that, they failed to index the increases for inflation. As a result, 30 of the expected 31 million taxpayers (97 percent) will be forced to pay the AMT by 2016 because of the Dem's decision not to index the increase for inflation.
  • In 1999, under Republican control, Congress passed a bill to implement a phased repeal of the AMT by this year. It would have proactively ended the problems we are now experiencing. The measure, however, was met with zero support from Senate Democrat's, and a veto pen from President Clinton. If Clinton had not vetoed it, the AMT would be a non-issue today, eradicated for good. Instead, we stand here today looking down the barrel of this problem.
So what are Charlie Rangel and the Democrat's proposing? In essence, they want to adopt a "steal from Peter to pay Paul" concept that still violates the original intent of the AMT -- keep a select few taxpayers from avoiding income taxes. Stephen Moore wrote a insightful column in the Wall Street Journal this morning, discussing the details of the Rangel plan. Also, a report released by the Senate Republican Policy Committee does a good job of laying out the general issues at stake.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos