This Thread of Libs Melting Down Over The Washington Post Not Endorsing Kamala...
Here's What a Shark Tank Host Said About Kamala That Caused a Total...
Now We’ll Never Know Who The Washington Post Supports
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 239: What the Bible Says About Truth –...
The Great Gaslight About the Great Replacement
Trump Takes an Axe to Tax
Exxon Knew! First Warming and Climate, Now Plastics
Turn Off the Politicians and Listen to Yourself
Alive and Ambulatory? Let’s Be Thankful for These Blessings.
Dangerous Words
America’s Greatness Is found in 'One Nation, Under God'
20 Reasons to Vote for Republicans-- and Especially for Donald Trump
Kamala, Jesus, and the Founders
Here’s the Highlights of Joe Rogan’s Three-Hour Interview With Trump
Israel Offers Grim Warning to Iran After Launching Strikes
Tipsheet

Can't Have It Both Ways On "Empathy" Justices

The Huffington Post and Media Matters are hollering about conservative news outlets ignoring the rest of Obama's statement with regards to "empathetic" Supreme Court justices. Here's the Obama quote that was commonly reported:
Advertisement

I view that quality of empathy, and understanding, and identifying with people's hopes and struggles as an essential ingredient for arriving at just decisions and outcomes.
It was followed up by this:
I will seek someone who is dedicated to the rule of law, who honors our Constitutional traditions, who respects the integrity of the judicial process, and the appropriate limits of the judicial role.
Sorry, but you can't have it both ways. "Identifying with people's hopes and struggles" is entirely separate from maintaining constitutional integrity on judicial issues. Inserting "empathy" into a legal ruling explicitly means you disregard meaningful judicial review, giving favor to groups you have more personal sympathy for instead of those who should be viewed favorably based on the letter of the law.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement