Hilton Hotel Chain Finally Responds to PR Disaster Involving ICE Agent Reservations
Trump Administration Takes Swift Action to Root Out Rampant Fraud in Minnesota
You Can’t Hate the Media Enough
The Townhall 50 – Ranking the Worst Journalists of 2025, Part 1: #31-50
The Racist Audacity of the Privileged Left
Dave McCormick Pens Inaugural Letter to Pennsylvania Voters
Maduro's Downfall
Donald Rorschach
Trump’s UN Ambassador Eviscerates Globalists Over Their Defense of Maduro
Maduro’s Arrest Sends a Long-Overdue Message of Hope and Justice to Families
Minnesota Democrats Circle the Wagons
A Blueprint for Mississippi in 2026
The Wealthy Man the Media Ignored
Trump Promotes 'America First' Primary Opponent After Thomas Massie Criticizes Maduro Raid
Trump Admin Freezes Childcare Funding for Blue States
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Issues Predictable Ruling on Letitia James and James Comey

AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey

A federal judge has thrown out the Justice Department’s prosecutions against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

The DOJ indicted Comey for allegedly lying to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding. James was accused of mortgage fraud for allegedly providing false information about several homes she owns on mortgage applications. Both individuals have been vocal critics of President Donald Trump, with James leading a lawsuit against Trump’s companies alleging fraud.

Advertisement

Senior U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie dismissed the indictments against Comey and James on Monday. He determined that the appointment of Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan was unlawful. The judge concluded that “the Attorney General’s attempt to install Ms. Halligan as Interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia was invalid,” which means she had no lawful authority to indict Comey and James.

The court explained that the process for appointing an interim U.S. Attorney is limited by statute. After a previous interim U.S. Attorney’s term expires, only the district court—not the Attorney General—possesses the authority to appoint a new official to this position.

The judge rejected the Justice Department’s argument that Attorney General Pam Bondi could retroactively appoint Halligan to address the problem.

Advertisement

The court concluded that Halligan’s actions were “unlawful exercises of executive power and must be set aside” and dismissed arguments that it could be remedied after the fact. 

However, Currie dismissed both cases without prejudice, meaning the DOJ could reindict them after Halligan’s position is filled.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement