Weird How ‘The Worst Kept Secrets’ Are Always About Democrats, Isn’t It?
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 316: The Meaning of Rain in the Eyes...
The Enigma of JD Vance
When 'Just a Game' Isn’t Just a Game Anymore
Two Moments in Annapolis Reveal a Deeper Cultural Drift
The Pope, Iran, and My Being Sentenced to Death As a Christian in...
Grace and Truth: Navigating Conversion Therapy and a Client’s Faith-Based Rights
DEI Over Duty: How the Secret Service Put Identity Politics Above Operational Competence
Leftists Use Russia As an Excuse to Censor Right Wing Media in US...
'No Threat Was Present': Walz's Iran Claim Collides With the Facts
Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Gets 14 Years for Flooding Wisconsin With Cocaine
Washington D.C. Homicides Plunge 52 Percent As National Guard Deployment Changes City's Cr...
Milwaukee Grocery Owner Pleads Guilty to $1.6M SNAP Fraud Scheme
Trump Signs Executive Order to Fast-Track Psychedelic Treatments for Mental Illness
This Radio Chatter From the Iranian Attack on an Oil Tanker Is Crazy
Tipsheet

Senate Rejects Rand Paul's Amendment to Remove This Provision From Spending Bill

Senate Rejects Rand Paul's Amendment to Remove This Provision From Spending Bill
Greg Nash/Pool via AP

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) is objecting to the spending bill that would reopen the government over a provision that would essentially ban hemp-derived THC products.

The provision would redefine legal hemp in a way that allows the government to ban its use or sale. The Senate on Monday overrode an amendment Paul had filed to remove the language and now the bill will go to the House with the provision intact.

Advertisement

From The Hill:

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters Monday morning there is only one “objector” to speeding up Senate consideration of the government funding package, referring to Paul, who wants to strip a provision from the package that would prevent the unregulated sale of intoxicating hemp-based products.

Paul said he’s just doing his job by standing up for Kentucky’s hemp industry. He argued he’s fully entitled under the Senate rules to use all the procedural time at his disposal to scrutinize the government funding package — which he opposes.

“Just to be clear: I am not delaying this bill. The timing is already fixed under Senate procedure. But there is extraneous language in this package that has nothing to do with reopening the government and would harm Kentucky’s hemp farmers and small businesses,” Paul said in a statement posted on the social platform X.  

“Standing up for Kentucky jobs is part of my job,” he wrote.

Paul wants to strip out language from the bill funding the Department of Agriculture that would ban the unregulated sale of intoxicating hemp-based or hemp-derived products, such as Delta-8, from being sold online or at gas stations and corner stores. The deal the Senate advanced Sunday includes full-year funding bills for military construction, veterans’ affairs, the Department of Agriculture and the legislative branch.

Advertisement

Currently, federal law allows the sale of hemp-derived THC products if they contain less than 0.3 percent total THC. The language in the provision is similar to one McConnell pushed into the agriculture funding bill back in July. It would ban most of these products, limiting them to 0.4 milligrams per container, which would eliminate any intoxicating effects.

A spokesperson for Sen. Paul told The Hill that the lawmaker “objects to the inclusion of provisions in the government-funding package that unfairly target Kentucky’s hemp industry” and that the provision is “unrelated to the budget and the government-reopening goal.”

The Hill noted that advocates aligned with the beer, wine and distilled spirits lobbied hard to convince lawmakers to rejected Paul’s amendment. 

A coalition of advocates for the beer, wine, and distilled spirits industry circulated a letter to senators Monday, urging them to defeat Paul’s amendment. In a letter circulated among Senate Republicans, they called on them to “reject Sen. Paul’s attempts to allow hemp-derived THC products to be sold devoid of federal regulation and oversight across the country.”

Advertisement

Now that the bill is with the House, there is a chance the provision could be removed. House Republicans, including Rep. James Comer (R-KY) back in September led a bipartisan effort to oppose the anti-hemp language from the latest agriculture-FDA appropriations bills. “Under the 2018 Farm Bill language, the hemp industry supports 320,000 American jobs, generates $28.4 billion in regulated market activity, and produces some $1.5 billion in state tax revenue,” the lawmakers wrote in a letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA).

Editor’s Note: After more than 40 days of screwing Americans, a few Dems have finally caved. The Schumer Shutdown was never about principle—just inflicting pain for political points.

Help us report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement