It’s Hard To Care About Democrats at All Anymore
The Politicization of Motherhood
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 318: What the Bible Says About Blood –...
New Group Aims to Clear Path for Microschools, Church-Based Schools As Choice Movement...
The Radioactive Jew
The Only Real Cure for Political Violence
America Needs the Bible
Counties, Not Capitals: The NPVIC Threat and the Case for a Real Electoral...
Sacred Ground, Secular Safety: Why the Holy Sepulchre Needs a Shelter Now
'Lights, Camera, Smuggle': Fake Movie Biz Used to Traffic Pakistanis Into America
The Onion Is Painfully Unfunny
Man Detained at Trump National Doral Miami Golf Resort
Haidt Drops a Bombshell: Right-Wing Parents Are Raising Happier, Healthier Kids
Jet Ski, New Home, and Food Stamps: Minnesota Business Owner Charged With SNAP...
Four Green Card Holders Charged With Illegal Voting in New Jersey Federal Elections
Tipsheet

NCLB Waivers Are Conditional

NCLB Waivers Are Conditional

The Obama administration made waves yesterday with the announcement that states can opt-out of some No Child Left Behind provisions. The states that receive waivers will not have to show that all children are proficient in reading and math by 2014, a main component of NCLB. 

Advertisement

 

Obama's announcement could fundamentally affect the education of tens of millions of children. It will allow states to scrap the requirement that all children must show they are proficient in reading and math by 2014 -- a cornerstone of the law -- if states meet conditions designed to better prepare and test students.

 

And the president took a shot at Congress, saying his executive action was needed only because lawmakers have not stepped in to improve the law for years.

 

"Congress hasn't been able to do it. So I will," Obama said. "Our kids only get one shot at a decent education."

 

If you thought that Obama was employing a more hands-off approach to education, though, you would be mistaken. Instead, the waivers come with strings attached and states can only opt out of NCLB if they agree to implement his proposals instead. It slips his regulations under the door, exchanging George Bush's rules for his, basically amounting to another executive fiat. Tina Korbe comments on this over at Hot Air:

States will receive a waiver if and only if they agree to certain conditions set by the Education Secretary. CNN calls those conditions “credible commitments to close lingering achievement gaps.” Conservatives call those conditions “strings attached” and “legislating through the executive branch.”

 

Chief among the administration’s stipulations for a waiver: The adoption of college-and-career-ready standards (a.k.a. national standards). National standards and tests might sound sensible in theory, but, in reality, they would strengthen federal power over education and weaken schools’ direct accountability to parents and taxpayers. Moreover, they would most likely lead to the standardization of mediocrity rather than the standardization of excellence.

 

But national standards are a favored policy proposal within the Obama Department of Education — and, again, with today’s move to introduce a qualified opt-out from NCLB, the president has found a way to circumvent Congress to push through this policy preference and other preferred “reforms.”

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement