How Could the Democrats Dump Biden If He Somehow Got Even More Senile...
We Had Another Creepy Incident Where FBI Agents Accosted Law-Abiding Americans Again
LIVE RESULTS: Elections in Virginia, Georgia, and Oklahoma
You Owe $100,000!
Press Pushes Fake News on 'Fake Videos', and NBC News Blames Bump Stocks...
Democrats Turn Lawfare Into a Campaign Ad
Young Voters Leaving Democrats and Biden
Ban Sanctuary Laws
Critics Fundamentally Misconstrue the Supreme Court's Bump Stock Ruling
Blocking Biden’s Transgender Mandate on Schools
Something Fishy at House Intel Committee
Deconstructing the Lefty Magazine 'The Nation'
Self-Serving Bureaucrats
Eugene Vindman Could be Headed to Congress After Primary Win
Bowman Looks Even More Doomed to Lose With This 'Unusual Favor' He Asked...

Follow Up on the SBA Pledge-Romney vs. Cain

So far there are three GOP contenders who won't sign the Susan B. Anthony List pledge to only appoint pro-life judges and cabinet members-Gary Johnson, Herman Cain and Mitt Romney. Gary Johnson is pro-choice, but what about the other two?


Herman Cain's position has to do with checks and balances. Cain says he won't sign it because he does not believe that, as president, he should advance Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. He clarified that, as president, he would happily sign the bill, but it's Congress's job to advance it. From his press release:


"I support right-to-life issues unequivocally and I adamantly support the first three aspects of the Susan B. Anthony pledge involving appointing pro-life judges, choosing pro-life cabinet members, and ending taxpayer-funded abortions. 

However, the fourth requirement demands that I 'advance' the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. As president, I would sign it, but Congress must advance the legislation.

I have been a consistent and unwavering champion of pro life issues. 

In no way does this singular instance of clarification denote an abandonment of the pro-life movement, but instead, is a testament to my respect for the balance of power and the role of the presidency."

Romney's reasons were a little different. He says that while he agrees with the goals of the Susan B. Anthony List, he does not want to end federal funding for hospitals, or be barred from appointing a cabinet member who is not pro-life. He lays it all out at The Corner:



As much as I share the goals of the Susan B. Anthony List, its well-meaning pledge is overly broad and would have unintended consequences. That is why I could not sign it. It is one thing to end federal funding for an organization like Planned Parenthood; it is entirely another to end all federal funding for thousands of hospitals across America. That is precisely what the pledge would demand and require of a president who signed it. 

The pledge also unduly burdens a president’s ability to appoint the most qualified individuals to a broad array of key positions in the federal government. I would expect every one of my appointees to carry out my policies on abortion and every other issue, irrespective of their personal views.

Well, there you have it. What do you think? Are these good reasons to duck the pledge, or is it time to start looking elsewhere?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos