Kamala's Inability to Secure Firefighters Union Endorsement Is Now Even More Humiliating
Biden Takes a Blowtorch to Obama in New Book
The Plague of Lonely Leftist Cat Women
The Cost of Free Money
When Kamala Harris' Promises Come to Nothing
Kamala's Parade of (Mostly) Pablum Interviews
Black Clergy Speak Out for Israel
One Year Later
Free Speech in the Crosshairs
Government Employees Exceed Population of Florida
Trump’s Bounce from Butler and Elon
Do Rocks on Mars Have Rights?
Highway to Hell
Social Media Must Become a Bastion for Free Speech
Is This Really How POLITICO Covered Hurricane Milton's Threat to Florida?
Tipsheet

Takeaways From the Third GOP Debate

AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell

MIAMI, FLORIDA - Last night's third Republican presidntial debate of the 2024 cycle, moderated by NBC News anchors and the Salem Radio Network's Hugh Hewitt, got a bit spicy at times. Compared to the previous few forums, this one was less of a free-for-all, as the rules were generally respected and enforced. Those rules didn't automatically allow candidates criticized by name to promptly respond, which helped maintain more order, but also took something away from the point of a debate. Overall, my impression was that once again, though several candidates helped themselves and looked the part, the forum did not alter the race in any significant way, thus benefiting the absent frontrunner, Donald Trump. The conservative South Florida voters I watched the event with agreed:

Advertisement


People were eager to share their views on who won, with Ron DeSantis unsurprisingly commanding the most support in his home state. But in that second question, I asked the room whether the previous two hours had changed the trajectory of the contest in any meaningful way. Not even a single hand went up to say 'yes;' every single raised hand was for 'no.' And in a race that Trump leads by a massive margin, that's really the biggest takeaway -- perhaps the only real takeaway -- whether one likes it or not. Whether voters in Iowa agree is an important question, which we'll address below. For his part, the former president held a counter-programming event in Florida, at which he accepted the endorsement of Arkansas Gov. Sarah Sanders, who served as his White House Press Secretary. 

As for last evening's proceedings, DeSantis and Haley got off to hot starts with strong opening answers.  The subject matter focused mostly on foreign policy for the first half of the debate, with a question about the economy (by far the top issue for voters) not coming until 9:07pm ET, more than an hour in.  The two leading contenders on stage sparred a few times over China and energy, but neither exchange was uncivil or particularly impactful.  The most memorable moment came when Vivek Ramaswamy, whose opening answer scorching the RNC and NBC drew virtual and literal applause from some conservatives, invoked Haley's daughter during a discussion of TikTok.  Haley reacted harshly, not without reason:

Advertisement


The TikTok discussion is an important one, given the app's espionage capacity on behalf of the CCP -- and as we've seen within the last month, its ability to pump dangerous propaganda onto young Americans' screens.  To many, forcing its sale in order for its algorithms to be controlled in the US, or banning it entirely, is the obvious course of action.  Ramaswamy, who positions himself as a China hawk, recently said he was persuaded by a prominent influencer to join and engage on the platform.  Whether conservatives should so until such time as a major change is made, so as not to cede the playing field to the Left, is a legitimate question.  Bringing a rival's child into it, however, felt tacky, and didn't go over well in the room.

And while there were good and substantive answers on a host of topics, one of the only portions of the evening that could have some lasting value was the short segment on abortion.  Given the GOP's struggles on the issue, contributing to several losses and general consternation, the candidates' comments on the issue were highly relevant.  Tim Scott gave the most traditional pro-life answer.  Chris Christie made a legal case about leaving the issue to states.  But Haley, DeSantis, and Ramaswamy all offered nuanced and personal pro-life responses that offered some conciliatory language, made an emotional case against abortion, and telegraphed reasonableness.  DeSantis' story about a girl who was nearly aborted growing up to become a high-level judicial appointment in Florida was powerful example.  Haley's reality check about what's realistic in Washington, while explicitly appealing to people across the spectrum on the issue, was almost the same verbatim answer she gave in the first debate.  It's a good and important one.  And it takes on renewed urgency on the heels of Tuesday's electoral setbacks.  And Ramaswamy stressed how flat-footed and ineffectively reactive many Republicans have been, allowing the other side to set the agenda.

Advertisement

Finally, if this race is ever going to get truly competitive, it will likely be up to early state voters to set that tone.  Polling shows Trump is comfortably ahead in all of them.  But are GOP voters fully settled on him, especially given his legal troubles, and Democrats' success in using his name to motivate their own base?  The answer seems to be yes, for the most part, but time will tell.  There's at least some hesitancy, plus an appetite for him to more fully engage in the nominating process among some Iowans:


The next debate, which Trump is also expected to skip, will take place in early December, hosted in Tuscaloosa, Alabama.  Republican voters begin making their selections in mid-January, starting with the Iowa caucuses.  I'll leave you with a few examples of why much of the "fact checking" industry is so broken and cringeworthy:

Advertisement


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement