Senate GOP Has Made Their Decision on Whether They'll Nuke the Filibuster
This House GOP Rep Is Missing...and He Represents One of the Most Competitive...
A Reporter Asked This Question Regarding Iran...and It Set Trump Off
It's an Underreported Story, But Also a Glaring National Security Issue
From Death Row: ‘Thank You’ From Christian Brothers Facing Execution for Their Faith
Rich NY Writer Who Called Stealing a 'Political Protest' Melts Down When Confronted...
Teenage Girl Suffers Concussion After Vicious Daylight Attack in NYC
A Virginia Democrat Just Proved His Party Doesn't Understand Rural America
Illegal Alien in Custody Following Horror Attack on Mom, Three-Year-Old Girl at San...
Australia and Sweden Teamed Up for the Most Unnecessary Scientific Study of All...
Search and Rescue Efforts Underway After Massive Tornado Strikes Vance Air Force Base...
A 21st Century Declaration of American Ideals
Exposed: A Suspected Sex Trafficking Operation Steps From NBC, Fox News in Midtown...
Trump Cuts FDA Red Tape on Ibogaine: Veterans Finally Get a Real Shot...
Kansas Legislature Shows Rest of Nation How to Get Good Things Done
Tipsheet

Schumer in 2013: Democrats Would Never Be So Reckless as to Shut Down the Government Over, Say, Immigration

Schumer in 2013: Democrats Would Never Be So Reckless as to Shut Down the Government Over, Say, Immigration

You already knew that both parties are trading hypocritical barbs over the current 'Schumer Shutdown,' but this clip from the archives is really quite special and simply too delicious not to share immediately.  Back when Republicans pushed a flawed shutdown strategy over Obamacare in 2013, a certain Senator from New York pronounced himself aghast.  The GOP's disgraceful 'hostage taking' was nothing short of "governmental chaos," he said during an ABC News appearance.  His own party would never go to such radical extremes, even over an issue in which they were deeply emotionally invested, he assured viewers.  Guess which issue he picked to illustrate his holier-than-thou 'for instance'?  It's okay to laugh:

Advertisement


This made me chuckle even harder than Steny Hoyer's amusing House floor fail on Friday.  The simple fact is that Shutdown Chuck's caucus has launched a 44-vote filibuster against a spending bill that would have kept the federal government open.  The measure did not include a single provision that Democrats actually oppose.  They've chosen to shut down the government because the spending bill did not include unrelated elements regarding immigration policy.  It's not a popular gambit:


And even when the issue of immigration is isolated in the survey, people don't believe that obstructing the construction of a border wall is worth leaving the DREAMers' fate unresolved:

Advertisement


Five Senate Democrats crossed the aisle to vote for the GOP government funding bill, but 60 votes are required to end the Democratic filibuster.  Reports are starting to leak out that rank-and-file elected Democrats and aides are growing more and more concerned about their party's shutdown adventure, wondering if leadership has an "exit strategy" and recognizing that shutting down the government on behalf of illegal immigrants may not be an ingenious maneuver:


But Democrats' ill-conceived, unpopular shutdown is all about DACA and immigration.   I'll leave you with Mitch McConnell vowing to force vote after vote to end the Schumer Shutdown and reopen the government.  It's up to the Senate minority:

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement