The Canadian School Shooter Has Been Identified
Norwegian Olympian: I Won the Bronze. Also, I Cheated on My Girlfriend
FBI Warns of Dangerous New Threat to ICE and Border Patrol Agents
Justice Department Wanted Michigan’s Voters’ Data — a Judge Had Other Ideas
Senate Democrats Are Gearing Up for a Fight to Protect Sanctuary Cities
Guess Which House Republican Voted Against the SAVE America Act Today
OSU Just Hired an Assistant Professor of What?
Antifa Is Now Targeting Moderate Congressional Democrats in Washington State
When Sports Were Fun
West Virginia Senate Has Good News on Gun Rights for Legal Adults Under...
Rep. Ted Lieu Blasts AG Pam Bondi for Not Interviewing an Epstein Witness,...
Mamdani Asks State Lawmakers to Approve a Two Percent Tax on the Wealthy...
Pam Bondi Goes Toe-to-Toe With Democrats in Explosive House Judiciary Hearing
Justice Jackson Defends Her Grammys Appearance
If ICE Is Hamstrung, Hold on to Your Wallets
Tipsheet

Oops: Bill Clinton 'Mistakenly' Misreports Taxable Income as Tax-Free Donations


Once again, mistakes -- passive voice -- were made:

Advertisement

The foundation has also come under scrutiny for failing to clear all foreign government donations through an agreed-upon State Department vetting process when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, and for failing to identify foreign government donations on tax returns. Fact-checkers this week challenged the foundation’s claims that it’s barred by Canadian privacy laws from revealing the names of more than 1,000 mostly foreign donors to a joint Clinton-Giustra nonprofit registered in Vancouver, British Columbia. It acknowledged in response to POLITICO’s questions that it mischaracterized as foundation donations money from the China Overseas Real Estate Development and the U.S.-Islamic World Conference. That money was actually honoraria paid for Bill Clinton speeches by those entities, said foundation officials, who added this week those were the only mistakes “we are aware of.”

Well, aside from all the undisclosed foreign donations (followed by empirically bogus excuses), and, you know, the tens of millions in foreign government payments that weren't reported in tax filings over at least five years. CBS News reported on several elements of Clinton's anti-transparency machinations last evening:


Not a bad report overall, although it did uncritically parrot the Clintons' 
Advertisement
debunked defense that 1,100 donors were left undisclosed due to unavoidable Canadian law requirements. Not true. Anyway, here's Hillary repeatedly promising disclosure and transparency during her confirmation hearings (via the Free Beacon):


"All contributors will be disclosed." Didn't happen, according to Bloomberg, the New York Times and the Boston Globe. "An extremely low percentage of [Clinton Foundation donations go] to overhead." False. "Foreign government pledges will be submitted to the State Department for review." Strike three.  And then there's this:


Can't pass that buck, Your Majesty. You "guaranteed" you'd be hands-on in ensuring your transparency vows were fully implemented. They weren't.  It's time to hand over your entire secret email cache to an independent third party for review.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement