Judge Dismisses Murder Case Against Father Who Killed His Daughter's Abuser
This Democrat Attorney General Is Still Trying to Prosecute Trump's Allies Over 2020
USA Today Marks Pride Month by Noting Support for Same-Sex Marriage Is on...
Francesca Hong Joins Bernie Sanders, AOC in Attacking Data Centers
What About the British Way of Life?
Francesca Hong Says Kids Are a 'Critical Investment,' but Her Record and Platform...
FRIENDLY FIRE: Hasan Piker Goes on Homophobic Rant Against Fellow Democrat
A British Trans Activist Was Just Jailed After Making Horrific Threats Against Women
Turns Out You Can’t Do That
Texas Is the New Capital for Fortune 500 Companies
Rep. Brandon Gill: Don't Be Fooled, Woke Isn't Dead It's Simply Lying Dormant
The May Jobs Report Destroys Expectations
Graham Platner Denies Key Details in Bombshell NYT Report
Democrats Went Bold on Immigration Demands. Trump Just Got the Last Laugh.
‘Homelessness’ Meets the Simulation Theory
Tipsheet

Oops: Bill Clinton 'Mistakenly' Misreports Taxable Income as Tax-Free Donations

Oops: Bill Clinton 'Mistakenly' Misreports Taxable Income as Tax-Free Donations

Once again, mistakes -- passive voice -- were made:

Advertisement

The foundation has also come under scrutiny for failing to clear all foreign government donations through an agreed-upon State Department vetting process when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, and for failing to identify foreign government donations on tax returns. Fact-checkers this week challenged the foundation’s claims that it’s barred by Canadian privacy laws from revealing the names of more than 1,000 mostly foreign donors to a joint Clinton-Giustra nonprofit registered in Vancouver, British Columbia. It acknowledged in response to POLITICO’s questions that it mischaracterized as foundation donations money from the China Overseas Real Estate Development and the U.S.-Islamic World Conference. That money was actually honoraria paid for Bill Clinton speeches by those entities, said foundation officials, who added this week those were the only mistakes “we are aware of.”

Well, aside from all the undisclosed foreign donations (followed by empirically bogus excuses), and, you know, the tens of millions in foreign government payments that weren't reported in tax filings over at least five years. CBS News reported on several elements of Clinton's anti-transparency machinations last evening:


Not a bad report overall, although it did uncritically parrot the Clintons' 
Advertisement
debunked defense that 1,100 donors were left undisclosed due to unavoidable Canadian law requirements. Not true. Anyway, here's Hillary repeatedly promising disclosure and transparency during her confirmation hearings (via the Free Beacon):


"All contributors will be disclosed." Didn't happen, according to Bloomberg, the New York Times and the Boston Globe. "An extremely low percentage of [Clinton Foundation donations go] to overhead." False. "Foreign government pledges will be submitted to the State Department for review." Strike three.  And then there's this:


Can't pass that buck, Your Majesty. You "guaranteed" you'd be hands-on in ensuring your transparency vows were fully implemented. They weren't.  It's time to hand over your entire secret email cache to an independent third party for review.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement