Lawmakers Demand Wray Correct the Record
Republicans Call Out Dems for Latest Trump Conspiracy Theory
An Honorary Squad Member Runs for President
Biden Justice Department Agrees to a Disgraceful Settlement With Lisa Page and Peter...
Harris Finally Nabs One Crucial But Expected Endorsement
What Trump Told Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago
Another Day Another Fresh Lie in the Press About Kamala's Past
Speaker Mike Johnson Puts Kamala Harris' Border Failures on Full Display
Trump Announces Plans to Return to the Site of His Would-Be Assassination
Is Gavin Newsom's Latest PR Stunt a Way to Secure Himself a Seat...
Kamala Harris Sits Down With Drag Pro-Palestine Advocates While Boycotting Netanyahu’s Vis...
Kamala Harris' Roadmap to the White House Left Out a Very Crucial Aspect
Dave McCormick's Ad Tying Bob Casey Jr to Kamala Harris Will Run During...
Why One Name Being Considered for the Trump Assassination Attempt Task Force Is...
Was Kamala Harris Complicit in Covering Up for Joe Biden? This Poll Is...
Tipsheet

Video: How Liberals Argue

Last night, I was invited to appear on Fox Business Network's Money with Melissa Francis to discuss the following story about Americans' personal savings:
 

Advertisement

28% of Americans Have No Savings

Nearly half of Americans -- 49 percent --don't have enough emergency savings to cover three months expenses - up from 46 percent last year, according to research released Monday by Bankrate.com.  Only one quarter of the people surveyed said they had saved six months' expenses, the generally recommended cushion, according to Bankrate.com, a Web-based financial content provider. That figure climbed by one percentage point compared to last year. 


It turns out that these numbers are actually improved over 2006, when the economy was humming along; people tend to save more and husband their resources during economic downturns.  My first reactions to this story were (a) to take inventory of my own savings to see how I stack up, and (b) to think through some back-of-the-envelope calculations about how I can allocate a responsible percentage of my income in future years.  Beyond that, I ruminated over the long-term trend of far too many Americans living far above their means in "fat" years, which can have a devastating impact when lean times unexpectedly hit.  Only then did I finally consider politics and the government -- and only in the context of the horrific budgeting example Washington is setting for its citizens.  When the segment began, the first question went to David Mercer, a Democratic strategist.  He seemed like a pleasant enough fellow when we chatted off the air, but once the lights were on, Mercer spun the conversation into a dizzying tornado of DNC talking points:
 

Advertisement


Remember, this segment was supposed to be about Americans' personal savings.  What this gentleman wanted it to be about was Bain Capital's "outsourcing," and Big Oil.  Needless to say, the intended discussion was completely derailed.  This is how the Left will operate for the next four months -- with a series of loud, indignant, cheap shots and non-sequiturs designed to detract from topics they'd prefer to avoid.  Incidentally, the Washington Post fact-checker awarded the Obama campaign 'Four Pinocchios' for its dishonest "outsourcing" attacks, and AEI's Jim Pethokoukis made mincemeat of a subsequent hit piece on the same subject.  Mitt Romney helped create well over 100,000 American jobs during his tenure at Bain, a record that Bill Clinton has called "sterling," and former Obama adviser Steve Rattner labeled the company's dealings "superb."  As for subsidies to Exxon, or whatever that yelling was about, I'm sure many conservatives would agree that both parties should try to scale back corporate welfare, but the tax treatment the energy industry enjoys is no different from a host of other industries -- so that buzzword-heavy attack was also misleading, in addition to being irrelevant.  Also notice that when he condemned "subsidies" for the energy industry, Mercer failed to mention the president's green jobs initiativeI wonder why.  Surely it's not because it's been a massive failure; it can't be!  Obama just said he wants to "double down" on the program in his second term.  Goodie.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement