A judge has rejected a lawsuit that sought to disqualify Representative Eric Swalwell from the California Governor's race, after claims rose that he may not actually be a resident of California.
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) can’t run for governor of California, he’s not a resident of the state.
— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) February 9, 2026
Or he committed mortgage fraud, a lawsuit alleges.
Either way he’s in legal trouble.
When he got his 2022 DC mortgage he listed that DC home as his primary.pic.twitter.com/YHxNH4c77a
The lawsuit was filed by conservative filmmaker Joel Gilbert, who argued that Rep. Eric Swalwell is not a true California resident.
Gilbert claimed Swalwell primarily lives in Washington, D.C., where he owns a home, and lacks a permanent residence in California. He pointed to the address listed on Swalwell’s candidacy paperwork, alleging it was a Sacramento office building or attorney’s office, not a personal residence, and cited the state constitution’s five-year residency requirement for governor.
However, Sacramento Superior Court Judge Shelleyanne Chang rejected the challenge and declined to remove Swalwell from the ballot, citing California Election Code Section 2026, which allows a leased or rented property to qualify as a domicile if it is used and maintained as a residence.
The ruling cited evidence that Swalwell pays rent, stays at a California property when he is in the state, keeps belongings there, receives mail at the address, and is registered to vote there. The congressman also submitted a sworn affidavit stating he has lived in Livermore since 2017, while the homeowner said Swalwell rents a room in her home. However, neighbors said they had never seen him.
"Court Hearing Update: Judge Chang (big attitude) erred by letting her tentative ruling stand that incorrectly accepted Swalwell's campaign worker's ridiculous declaration that Swalwell lived with her family," Gilbert wrote on X. "I HAVE already FILED AN APPEAL!"
Court Hearing Update: Judge Chang (big attitude) erred by letting her tentative ruling stand that incorrectly accepted Swalwell's campaign worker's ridiculous declaration that Swalwell lived with her family.
— Joel Gilbert (@JoelSGilbert) March 23, 2026
I HAVE already FILED AN APPEAL! Read it here:https://t.co/LNIGvAS3L1
Swalwell Disqualification Update:
— Joel Gilbert (@JoelSGilbert) March 23, 2026
Third Court of Appeals DENIED my petition with no explanation!
I appealed to the CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, an emergency 'PETITION FOR REVIEW AND APPLICATION FOR IMMEDIATE STAY'.
Confirmation below. Supreme Court should consider before Wed. pic.twitter.com/xA519YWBK6
"My CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT case number is S295810. Petition for Review and Application for Immediate Stay is now PENDING to disqualify Eric Swalwell," he wrote in a ceperate post. "Swalwell has NO California residence as required by the CA Constitution for 5 years prior to an election."
My CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT case number is S295810. Petition for Review and Application for Immediate Stay is now PENDING to disqualify Eric Swalwell. Swalwell has NO California residence as required by the CA Constitution for 5 years prior to an election.https://t.co/SQXNViyF2l pic.twitter.com/CjZJtpKYn6
— Joel Gilbert (@JoelSGilbert) March 24, 2026
Swalwell is currently leading the field of Democrats in the state's gubernetorial race, although two Republicans Steve Hilton, and Chad Bianco currently lead the race.
New - California governor primary
— Political Polls (@PpollingNumbers) March 18, 2026
🔴 Hilton 17%
🔴 Bianco 16%
🔵 Swalwell 13%
🔵 Porter 13%
🔵 Steyer 10%
🔵 Becerra 5%
🔴 Top 2 go for a runoff
Barkley #B - RV - 3/14 pic.twitter.com/Hfg6WiVV11
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member