If That Figure Is Correct, That Is a Massive Infiltration of Hezbollah by...
Australian Federal Police Commissioner Did Not Just Say That About the Bondi Terror...
Hamas Operatives Funneled Over $8 Million to Military Wing in Italian Fundraising Scheme
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Is Pregnant
Louisiana Conspiracy Used Chop Shop and Fake Company to Sell Stolen Tractors, Excavators,...
Over $200,000 in Cryptocurrency Forfeited in Multi-State Elder Fraud Case
Tweaking the Naughty List: Cops Seize 55 Pounds of Drugs Disguised as Christmas...
Jamaican National Sentenced to More Than 24 Years in Federal Meth Trafficking Case
Why is Ilhan Omar's Husband's Investment Firm Removing Names From Their Website?
Tennessee Bookkeeper Who Stole $4.6 Million From Clients Sentenced to Prison
Make Vehicles Affordable Again
FBI Saves Taxpayers Billions in HQ Relocation
Gunman Dead, 3 Injured After Opening Fire on Idaho Sheriff's Office
Indicted Democrat Gets Dragged For Post Hiding $100k Ring Bought With Dirty Money
340B Program is Hidden Tax on Patients, Employers and Taxpayers
Tipsheet

Federalism Not Failure: Why Shifting Welfare to the States Is a Good Thing

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

In another example of the Left forgetting the principles on which the United States was founded, a CNN article titled "Republicans tweak the social contract to ask more of states" argues that a shift away from relying on the Federal government for welfare policy will be a great loss to Americans. Rather, it should be viewed as a return to tradition and a net benefit to the stability of American politics.

Advertisement

The article discusses how states will now have to split the cost of programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and contribute more of their budget to programs like Medicaid. Furthermore, states will soon have less federal funding overall for disaster relief and education. Democrat Governor Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan told CNN that states would not be able to backfill cuts to Medicaid, and other Democrats see the loss of funding as damaging to the efficacy of these programs. 

Rather than a great loss, this will be a great lesson in Federalism for the Democrats, as well as one in ensuring each taxpayer dollar is spent effectively. The Left in America likes to forget that the Federal government was never intended to provide for states, nor was it meant to become the head welfare distributor. They rely on Federal funding to legitimize entitlement programs, which is both shallow and misguided. The benefit of having individual states is that each state, with its unique population, has an easier time determining the exact needs of its citizens, as its government initiatives have a more direct impact on their lives. This is extended to any welfare policy, especially as priorities, needs, and funding are different by state. We could also begin to see creative ways in which welfare programs are run, allowing for a sort of free market in policy solutions. Americans might see better programs come about, and ensure that they help more than any federal program could.

Advertisement

Individual states will have the freedom to determine which programs they need more than others, as well as to ensure that the money they choose to spend on those programs is spent effectively. The common strategy of most politicians is to firehose money at an issue. This is not a tenable strategy, especially as our national debt grows, and politicians struggle to do anything to properly address it. It is time to promote wisdom in our spending, creativity in our solutions, and remain well-versed in the wisdom of our Constitution. Reducing Federal funding will do just that.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement