This Dem Rep Tried to Slip in This Lie About Medicaid, but Scott...
You'll Never Guess What the Dem Senator Who Got Manhandled by Federal Agents...
This Could Be the Most Insane Ruling From a Rogue Judge...And It Relates...
The Usual Suspects (and Some New) in the Senate Are Threatening to Kill...
Tulsi Gabbard Is Making Spy Agencies Nervous With This New Team
Illegal Detainees Give Alligator Alcatraz a One-Star Review, and Bulwark Censors Its Own...
Texas’s Midterm Maneuver: GOP’s Move to Block Democrats in 2026
Pence Calls Tillis’s Criticism of Hegseth ‘Not Fair’
Congressman May Run Against Ossoff to Flip Senate Seat
Ex-CIA Officer Claims Deep State Likely Destroyed Epstein Files
Trump Announces 35 Percent Tariffs on Canada
John Fetterman Breaks Ranks: Dem Senator Slams Calls to Abolish ICE as Outrageous
Trump Floats Federal Takeover of D.C. to Cut Down on Crime
Border Patrol Ambush Underscores Danger of Anti-Law Enforcement Rhetoric As Dems Push to...
Freedom to Choose: How Trump's New Tax Credits Equip Parents
Tipsheet

Senate Passes Budget on Straight Party-line Vote, Cruz and Paul Vote 'No'

Working late into the early morning on Friday, Republicans in the U.S. Senate narrowly passed a budget that balances, cuts the size and scope of the federal government, and doesn’t raise taxes. Before the measure passed, however, Congressional Democrats predictably described it as “an absolute farce” and “insensitive.” Nevertheless, since Senate Democrats failed to even introduce a budget for years when they controlled the upper chamber (although they did pass a budget in 2013) perhaps a few plaudits are in order:

Advertisement

The 52-46 vote came at 3:28 a.m., after the Senate considered hundreds of amendments and voted on dozens — many of them politically freighted, some of them contradictory, but none of them binding. No Democrats voted for the budget. Among Republicans, only Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, who is likely to seek the White House, and Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, who has announced his intention to do so, voted no.

Senator Michael B. Enzi of Wyoming, chairman of the Budget Committee, hailed a plan that he said would “protect the nation’s most vulnerable citizens, strengthen national defense and bring robust economic growth.”

Democrats said it would be a disaster — if it ever happened.

But will it happen? Unlikely, my friends, as it will never reach the president’s desk:

The budgets themselves are nonbinding and do not require a presidential signature. Once each chamber passes its version, the House and Senate will try to agree on a common plan, something that last happened in 2009. Then lawmakers will draft separate legislation to implement the programs.

While the Senate budget is imperfect and therefore did not earn universal GOP support, it is a much better alternative than what the president served up, which was deemed “dead on arrival” by Republicans because of its massive spending increases and failure to balance. Surprise. And unlike Senate Democrats, at least Senate Republicans are following the letter of the law and governing.

Advertisement

“The real fights on the budget will come this summer, as those appropriations bills work their way through a similar process,” Ed Morrissey explains to readers over at Hot Air. “Still, it’s the first time in six years that Congress has done its job at all, let alone on time.”

And that, of course, is commendable. Embarrassingly, the normal budget process was all but jettisoned under the heavy-handedness of then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) when Democrats controlled the upper chamber.

Perhaps this is why so few Republican lawmakers will be sorry to see him go.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement