Hegseth Responded Perfectly to the Libs' Uproar Over Our Air Campaign Against Narco-Terror...
Walk, Don't Run, Concerning This Latest Development About the J6 Pipe Bomb Suspect
Lawmaker Under Fire for Representing Somalia Instead of Her Constituents
Supreme Court Just Agreed to Rule on This Controversial Immigration-Related Executive Orde...
Yes, Richard Gere, Illegal Immigrants Are (D)ifferent
Check Out What This Chinese Communist Agent Said About NY Governor Kathy Hochul
The Media's Latest Defense of Minnesota's Somali Community Fails Basic Math
Green New Deal Countdown: Ocasio-Cortez Stays Silent Amid Retreat of Climate Alarmism
JD Vance Blasts 'Bullsh*t Narrative’ Blaming Trump Administration for Biden’s Economy
The Book (and the Monk) Behind the Pope
Two Illinois Brothers Indicted in $293M COVID Testing Fraud Scheme
Woman Charged With Smuggling Aliens Through Canada
Maxine Waters Calls Trump a Killer For Destroying NarcoTerrorists
ATMs Help Trace $250K Unemployment Fraud Scheme to Michigan Government Employee and Partne...
Prosecutors: Ex-Contractors Wiped 96 Government Databases in Retaliatory Plot
Tipsheet

Report: Assad to Give Up Chemical Weapons

The “escape hatch” is still open, it seems:

Advertisement

Before we start uncorking the champagne bottles, it’s important to recognize that this new development is fraught with at least two problems, according to New York Times columnist Tom Friedman: First, how do we even know Assad -- the man who almost certainly gassed his own people -- will act in good faith? And second, who is going to enforce this resolution, a proposal Secretary Kerry himself said “can’t be done”? The Russians? Please:

A new situation has been created in the last two days by the Russian offer — embraced by Obama, all of our major allies and China, but still only vaguely accepted by Syria — for Syria to turn over its stockpiles of poison gas to international control. Let’s have no illusion. There’s still a real possibility that the Russians and Syrians are just stalling and will fudge in the end, and even if one or both are serious, there are formidable logistical and political obstacles to securing Syria’s chemical weapons swiftly and completely. Part of me wonders: Has anybody thought this through?

As many have written, confiscating Assad’s chemical weapons is a political solution to the Syrian crisis; it will not restore the current administration’s credibility on the world stage nor carry out President Obama’s “red line” proclamation. Basically, the Assad regime -- if the Russians’ deeply flawed fig leaf proposal becomes official administration policy -- will get away with murdering innocent children with chemical weapons. That’s just a fact. In fairness to the president, though, there are no good options here. He can either (a) send in ground troops (which no one wants), (b) commence a bombing campaign (which most people don’t want), or (c) find a symbolic yet empty compromise that allows Team Obama to quickly declare victory and focus on other matters. Ding Ding Ding. Door number three looks like the most palatable option at this point, no? And while we still don’t know if this plan for peace will work out (how we even got to this point is nothing short of a miracle), it seems to be the administration's only ace up its sleeve.

Advertisement

Related:

SYRIA

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos