So, That's How The New York Times Framed the ICE Ambush in Minneapolis...
The Departure of Top DOJ Attorneys Allegedly Over the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis...
Remember When CNN Did Ride-Alongs With ICE? Here's the (D)ifference.
Why This Exchange Between Josh Hawley and a Lib Doctor on Abortion Pills...
Minneapolis Rioters Turn Street Into a War Zone While Stealing Weapons From Federal...
US Military Intervention in Iran Could Be Imminent
Senator Cruz Highlights Fatal Failures in Biden’s Afghan Parolee Program
Jacob Frey Just Said He Never Incited Violence Against ICE. Here Are Times...
Voters Rejected the ‘Values’ Minneapolis Democrats Hold Dear
Trump Just Gave Minnesota an Ultimatum
St. Paul Teachers Union Orders Members to ‘Pick a Side’ and Walk Out...
Cea Weaver Identifies the 'Huge Problem' Obstructing Her Communist Housing Agenda, and Gue...
Here’s How Jasmine Crockett Handled Tough Questions About Her Double Standard
Oh, Wittle Zohran Got So Mad Did He
White House Tells Walz to 'Resign in Disgrace' After Anti-ICE Meltdown
Tipsheet

Missouri AG: Charges Against the McCloskeys Could Have 'Chilling Effect' on the State

AP Photo/Jeff Roberson

Mark and Patricia McCloskey became internet sensations when they emerged from their home in St. Louis, MO and showed nearby protesters that they were gun owners. Mark wielded his rifle, while his wife Patricia brandished a hand gun. They weren't about to let their home have the same fate as countless businesses across the country that have been burned or looted by rioters in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd.

Advertisement

And yet, on Monday, St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner charged the couple with a Class E felony and a misdemeanor, for the unlawful use of a weapon. In her filing, Gardner alleged that the McCloskeys created an unsafe environment for the largely "peaceful, unarmed protesters." She didn't note that Mr. McCloskey said that he heard a man in the crowd click two loaded gun magazines together and say, "you're next." 

"Today my office filed charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey following an incident involving peaceful, unarmed protestors on June 28th," Gardner said in a statement. "It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner at those participating in nonviolent protest, and while we are fortunate this situation did not escalate into deadly force, this type of conduct is unacceptable in St. Louis."

Missouri Gov. Mike Parson rejected her narrative, and told Fox News's Tucker Carlson that the McCloskeys "had every right to protect their property."

Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt came to the same conclusion and sought a dismissal of the case the same day that Gardner filed the charges. And if the circuit attorney's office manages to succeed in charging the couple, Schmitt said it could have a "chilling effect" all across the state.

Advertisement

According to Schmitt, it should be fairly straightforward because Missouri's Castle Doctrine could not be clearer. The doctrine states that you have a right to defend your life, your family, and your property. Under these circumstances, he noted, "it's not even a crime." So, he added, the fact that Gardner has introduced these charges is "very concerning" and will have "broad implications for Missourians" if they feel they can't exercise their Second Amendment rights.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) also accused Gardner of running a political operation.

Advertisement

Should the McCloskeys be charged, Gov. Parson said he would quickly issue them a pardon.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement