Here's Pam Bondi's Stance on Illegal Immigration and Cartel Traffickers
What CNN's Top Legal Analyst Said About Trump's AG Pick Might Have Irritated...
Scott Presler to PA Dems Who Tried to Steal the Election: We're Coming...
Here's What Caused a Woman to Chop Up Her Father on Election Night
The Trump Counter-Revolution Is a Return to Sanity
ABC News Actually Attempts to Pin Laken Riley's Murder on Donald Trump
What Was the Matt Gaetz Attorney General Pick Really About?
Tom Cotton Issues 'Friendly Reminder' to ICC After Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant
'Obstructionist Transition': Biden Administration Is 'Loosening Immigration Policies' on t...
New Legislation Puts the Department of Education on the Chopping Block
Is It the End of the 'Big Media Era'?
A Political Mandate in Support of Pro-Second Amendment Policy
Here's Where MTG Will Fit Into the Trump Administration
Liberal Media Is Already Melting Down Over Pam Bondi
Dem Bob Casey Finally Concedes to Dave McCormick... Weeks After Election
Tipsheet

Missouri AG: Charges Against the McCloskeys Could Have 'Chilling Effect' on the State

AP Photo/Jeff Roberson

Mark and Patricia McCloskey became internet sensations when they emerged from their home in St. Louis, MO and showed nearby protesters that they were gun owners. Mark wielded his rifle, while his wife Patricia brandished a hand gun. They weren't about to let their home have the same fate as countless businesses across the country that have been burned or looted by rioters in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd.

Advertisement

And yet, on Monday, St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner charged the couple with a Class E felony and a misdemeanor, for the unlawful use of a weapon. In her filing, Gardner alleged that the McCloskeys created an unsafe environment for the largely "peaceful, unarmed protesters." She didn't note that Mr. McCloskey said that he heard a man in the crowd click two loaded gun magazines together and say, "you're next." 

"Today my office filed charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey following an incident involving peaceful, unarmed protestors on June 28th," Gardner said in a statement. "It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner at those participating in nonviolent protest, and while we are fortunate this situation did not escalate into deadly force, this type of conduct is unacceptable in St. Louis."

Missouri Gov. Mike Parson rejected her narrative, and told Fox News's Tucker Carlson that the McCloskeys "had every right to protect their property."

Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt came to the same conclusion and sought a dismissal of the case the same day that Gardner filed the charges. And if the circuit attorney's office manages to succeed in charging the couple, Schmitt said it could have a "chilling effect" all across the state.

Advertisement

According to Schmitt, it should be fairly straightforward because Missouri's Castle Doctrine could not be clearer. The doctrine states that you have a right to defend your life, your family, and your property. Under these circumstances, he noted, "it's not even a crime." So, he added, the fact that Gardner has introduced these charges is "very concerning" and will have "broad implications for Missourians" if they feel they can't exercise their Second Amendment rights.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) also accused Gardner of running a political operation.

Advertisement

Should the McCloskeys be charged, Gov. Parson said he would quickly issue them a pardon.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement