Yes, Democrats Are Even Anti-Nice Meals for Our Troops
Huh? Dems Are Going to Try and Hurt Trump Over This?
This CNN Reporter's Tweet About Trump, Polling, and Iran Is Laughably Predictable
The Latest Update on the Suspected Old Dominion University Terror Attack Is Infuriating
US Officials Warn That Iran Is Opening Up a New Front In the...
Secretary Hegseth Provided an Update on Operation Epic Fury. Here's What He Said.
Here's More Proof Mamdani's Wife Has an Antisemitism Problem
Is Buzzfeed About to Go Bust?
CENTCOM Confirms Four Heroes Killed In Refueling Aircraft Crash
The State of American Conservation Is Strong at SCI Convention
Yeah, You Forgot About God
CNN Repeatedly Screws Up on Mamdani and Two Muslims With Bombs
Democrats Side With the Mullahs
Trump Is Right: The Save America Act Is Crucial
TrumpRx Is a Step Toward Making the Pharma Market Finally Work for America
Tipsheet

Fox News Fights Back Against University of Chicago Coronavirus Study That Smears Hosts

Fox News Fights Back Against University of Chicago Coronavirus Study That Smears Hosts
AP Photo/Julie Jacobson

The University of Chicago thought that an analysis of how "seriously" two Fox News hosts covered the coronavirus outbreak would make for an intriguing study. So they took samples of Sean Hannity's and Tucker Carlson's audiences to try and gather how those viewers responded, and how they fared during the health crisis.

Advertisement

The study concluded that the Fox hosts, particularly Hannity, did some real damage.

"We provide evidence that greater exposure to Hannity relative to Tucker Carlson Tonight increased cases and deaths throughout March and early April," the study claims

The researchers chalk up the fatalities to their being fed "misinformation" and "propaganda." 

"We first show that, controlling for a rich set of county-level demographics (including the local market share of Fox News), greater local viewership of Hannity relative to Tucker Carlson Tonight is associated with a greater number of COVID-19 cases starting in early March and a greater number of deaths resulting from COVID-19 starting in mid-March," the study states.

The study suggests that Hannity particularly put people in danger because he "downplayed" the threat of the virus, which meant that his viewers changed their behavior later than Carlson's viewers did.

Yes, they really did a whole study on this.

Hannity and Fox News responded to the partisan report.

"The selective cherry-picked clips of Sean Hannity’s coverage used in this study are not only reckless and irresponsible, but down right factually wrong," a Fox News spokesperson said in a statement responding to the study. "As this timeline proves, Hannity has covered Covid-19 since the early days of the story. The ‘study’ almost completely ignores his coverage and repeated, specific warnings and concerns from January 27-February 26 including an early interview with Dr. Fauci in January. This is a reckless disregard for the truth.”

Advertisement

Related:

CORONAVIRUS

If this was such an important study to conduct, then where is their study on CNN downplaying the virus? In early March, Anderson Cooper said that the flu was deadlier than COVID-19.

If the University of Chicago had any other goal than to try and prove Fox News killed people, then they could have fooled me.

Editor's Note: Want to support Townhall so we can keep telling the truth about China and the virus they unleashed on the world? Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code WUHAN to get 25% off VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement