Pre-Election Special SALE: 60% Off VIP Membership
BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules on Whether Virginia Can Remove Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls
Tim Walz's Gaming Session With Ocasio-Cortez Was a Trainwreck
Oregon Predicates Request to Judge on Self-Delusion
GDP Report Shows Economy 'Weaker Than Expected'
How Trump Plans to Help Compensate Victims of 'Migrant Crime'
NRCC Blasts the Left's Voter Suppression Efforts in Battleground Districts
Watch Trump's Reaction to Finding Out Biden Called His Supporters 'Garbage'
Scott Jennings Calls Out CNN Host, Panelists Trying to Desperately Explain Away Biden's...
There Was a Vile, Violent Attack in Chicago, and the Media's Been Silent....
One Red State Just Acquired a Massive Amount of Land to Secure Its...
Poll Out of Texas Shows That Harris Rally Sure Didn't Work for Colin...
This Hollywood Actor Is Persuading Christian Men to Vote for Kamala Harris
Is the Trump Campaign Over-Confident?
Is This Really How the Kamala HQ Is Going to Respond to Biden’s...
Tipsheet

Fox News Fights Back Against University of Chicago Coronavirus Study That Smears Hosts

AP Photo/Julie Jacobson

The University of Chicago thought that an analysis of how "seriously" two Fox News hosts covered the coronavirus outbreak would make for an intriguing study. So they took samples of Sean Hannity's and Tucker Carlson's audiences to try and gather how those viewers responded, and how they fared during the health crisis.

Advertisement

The study concluded that the Fox hosts, particularly Hannity, did some real damage.

"We provide evidence that greater exposure to Hannity relative to Tucker Carlson Tonight increased cases and deaths throughout March and early April," the study claims

The researchers chalk up the fatalities to their being fed "misinformation" and "propaganda." 

"We first show that, controlling for a rich set of county-level demographics (including the local market share of Fox News), greater local viewership of Hannity relative to Tucker Carlson Tonight is associated with a greater number of COVID-19 cases starting in early March and a greater number of deaths resulting from COVID-19 starting in mid-March," the study states.

The study suggests that Hannity particularly put people in danger because he "downplayed" the threat of the virus, which meant that his viewers changed their behavior later than Carlson's viewers did.

Yes, they really did a whole study on this.

Hannity and Fox News responded to the partisan report.

"The selective cherry-picked clips of Sean Hannity’s coverage used in this study are not only reckless and irresponsible, but down right factually wrong," a Fox News spokesperson said in a statement responding to the study. "As this timeline proves, Hannity has covered Covid-19 since the early days of the story. The ‘study’ almost completely ignores his coverage and repeated, specific warnings and concerns from January 27-February 26 including an early interview with Dr. Fauci in January. This is a reckless disregard for the truth.”

Advertisement

If this was such an important study to conduct, then where is their study on CNN downplaying the virus? In early March, Anderson Cooper said that the flu was deadlier than COVID-19.

If the University of Chicago had any other goal than to try and prove Fox News killed people, then they could have fooled me.

Editor's Note: Want to support Townhall so we can keep telling the truth about China and the virus they unleashed on the world? Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code WUHAN to get 25% off VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement