Why Are Male-Identifying Democrat Candidates All Creepy Weirdos?
After Scott Pelley Was Shown the Door, These CBS News Reporters Aren't Leaving
Spencer Pratt's Chances of Making the LA Mayoral Runoff Might Have Collapsed
Wait, Scott Pelley Never Heard of Bari Weiss?
Republicans Need to Come Up With a Reason to Vote for Them Beyond...
It Will Stop When the American People Decide to Stop It, and Not...
Boeing vs SpaceX
Politics Isn’t Fair. Bianco Should Have Won.
The Invasion of the Ballot Snatchers
America Argues About the Constitution It Doesn't Know
Leftist Judge Sentences Conservative Lawyer to a Year in Prison Over a Non-Material...
Israel Launches Retaliatory Air Strikes After Iranian Missile Attack
Arizona Couple Who Stole $12M From Medicaid Bought a $300K Lamborghini — Now...
Los Angeles Mayoral Race Tightens – And a Left-Wing Challenger Is Gaining Ground
Illegal Immigrant Who Ran Cocaine Ring From His Bedroom Gets 12 Months in...
Tipsheet

Another Democrat Is 'Yes' on Impeachment, and It May Be the Most Surprising One Yet

Another Democrat Is 'Yes' on Impeachment, and It May Be the Most Surprising One Yet
AP Photo/Heather Ainsworth

With Wednesday's imminent vote on impeachment in the full House of Representatives, Trump district Democrats now need to make a decision. And one-by-one, these vulnerable lawmakers are making the riskier political choice: that President Trump deserves it. Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) got the ball rolling early Monday morning with her announcement that she's all in for impeachment. Some gave her a standing ovation, but many others protested

Advertisement

Then came Utah Rep. Ben McAdams. He's also a "yes" because, he insists, Trump had sinister political motives in his July phone call with Ukraine.

"The president abused the power of his office by demanding a foreign government perform a personal favor," the Democrat said.

The most surprising "yes" vote so far, in my opinion, is Rep. Anthony Brindisi (D-NY). For months he's been reluctant to join in the impeachment process, wanting to focus on other agenda items like infrastructure. In fact, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's pledge to him that she'd consider his infrastructure legislation is a big reason he decided to vote for her speakership. But, on Monday, he joined the majority of his colleagues and said he'll be voting in favor of impeachment.

Brindisi revealed his decision in an op-ed for Syracuse.com, explaining why this whole process has caused him "great pain."

Advertisement

"Why?" he asked. "Because I’ve successfully partnered with this president to improve the lives of many American families."

For instance, he commended Trump for working with him to extend housing and transportation programs to veterans and passing the first-ever fentanyl sanctions legislation. Yet, he's concluded that Trump's call with Ukrainian President Zelensky was "unconstitutional."

Like Slotkin, reactions from Brindisi's constituents were mixed.

Others applauded him for "respecting the rule of law" and "finally realizing he's a Democrat."

So, the tally remains at just two Democrats who are voting "no"; Minnesota's Collin Peterson and New Jersey's Jeff Van Drew, the latter of whom is so disenchanted with Pelosi and the like that he's switching parties. White House adviser Kellyanne Conway commended Van Drew on Fox News Tuesday morning.

Advertisement

"History will show that Pelosi lied," Conway said. "Public opinion has gone the other direction. Van Drew is voting his conscience."

Thirty-one Democrats won in Trump-friendly districts last year. As the New York Post put it, "Now the rookies must choose which of their voters to piss off."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement