It's Not Hard to See Why NPR's New CEO Dodged This Simple Question...
Did The Washington Post Take Orders from Biden WH to Go After a...
The Republicans Are Really a Mess
UK Police Officer Had an Odd Exchange with a Jewish Bystander During Pro-Hamas...
Google Doesn’t Want You to Read This
Democrats Give More Credence to Donald Trump's Talk of a 'Rigged Witch Hunt'
Jesse Watters Blamed for Reading WaPo
Here's How Iran's Foreign Minister Responded to Israel's Latest Strike
'Our Constitution Was Made Only for a Moral and Religious People,' Part Three
DeSantis Honors Bay of Pigs Veterans on Invasion’s 63rd Anniversary
Bombshell Testimony Reveals WHO Pushed for COVID Vaccine Passports Despite Knowing They We...
Corrupt Letitia James Asks Judge to Reject Trump's $175 Million Bond
Dem Official Says It's 'Not a News Story' Would-Be School Shooter Identifies As...
Gun Control Enables Sexual Violence
'Hating America, 101' – A Course for Homegrown Terrorists?

Another Democrat Is 'Yes' on Impeachment, and It May Be the Most Surprising One Yet

AP Photo/Heather Ainsworth

With Wednesday's imminent vote on impeachment in the full House of Representatives, Trump district Democrats now need to make a decision. And one-by-one, these vulnerable lawmakers are making the riskier political choice: that President Trump deserves it. Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) got the ball rolling early Monday morning with her announcement that she's all in for impeachment. Some gave her a standing ovation, but many others protested


Then came Utah Rep. Ben McAdams. He's also a "yes" because, he insists, Trump had sinister political motives in his July phone call with Ukraine.

"The president abused the power of his office by demanding a foreign government perform a personal favor," the Democrat said.

The most surprising "yes" vote so far, in my opinion, is Rep. Anthony Brindisi (D-NY). For months he's been reluctant to join in the impeachment process, wanting to focus on other agenda items like infrastructure. In fact, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's pledge to him that she'd consider his infrastructure legislation is a big reason he decided to vote for her speakership. But, on Monday, he joined the majority of his colleagues and said he'll be voting in favor of impeachment.

Brindisi revealed his decision in an op-ed for, explaining why this whole process has caused him "great pain."


"Why?" he asked. "Because I’ve successfully partnered with this president to improve the lives of many American families."

For instance, he commended Trump for working with him to extend housing and transportation programs to veterans and passing the first-ever fentanyl sanctions legislation. Yet, he's concluded that Trump's call with Ukrainian President Zelensky was "unconstitutional."

Like Slotkin, reactions from Brindisi's constituents were mixed.

Others applauded him for "respecting the rule of law" and "finally realizing he's a Democrat."

So, the tally remains at just two Democrats who are voting "no"; Minnesota's Collin Peterson and New Jersey's Jeff Van Drew, the latter of whom is so disenchanted with Pelosi and the like that he's switching parties. White House adviser Kellyanne Conway commended Van Drew on Fox News Tuesday morning.


"History will show that Pelosi lied," Conway said. "Public opinion has gone the other direction. Van Drew is voting his conscience."

Thirty-one Democrats won in Trump-friendly districts last year. As the New York Post put it, "Now the rookies must choose which of their voters to piss off."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos