Trump Is About to Tell Us Which Candidate He Wants for Texas Senate
Police Warned the Fairfax County Prosecutor About the Violent Illegal Alien Who Murdered...
Legendary Notre Dame Football Coach Lou Holtz Has Died Aged 89
Jim Jordan Exposed Tim Walz's Dishonesty at Oversight Committee Hearing on Minnesota Fraud
Wyoming Sheriffs Have Problem Preserving Second Amendment
Iranian Women's Rights Activist Calls Out Kamala Harris Silence on Regime's Atrocities: 'W...
Despite What Democrats May Tell You, Americans Want the SAVE Act
Victor Davis Hanson Explains Why This Time The War in the Middle East...
Kurdish Forces in Iraq Have Launched a Ground Invasion Against Iran
Montana Sen. Steve Daines Won't Seek Re-Election
West Virginia Man Faces Federal Charges for Alleged Death Threats to President Trump,...
$360 Million Stolen: New Bill Targets Rampant SNAP Card Skimming
Honduran National Sentenced to 6.5 Years for Assaulting ICE Officer in Oklahoma City
U.S. Senate Rejects Measure to Halt Strikes on Iran
Japanese National Who Allegedly Tried to Sell Plutonium to Fake Iranian General Sentenced...
Tipsheet

WATCH: Rep. Elise Stefanik Shades Chairman Schiff at DNI Hearing

WATCH: Rep. Elise Stefanik Shades Chairman Schiff at DNI Hearing

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has been offering some interesting interpretations of both the transcript of the call between President Trump and Ukraine President Zelensky in July and the whistleblower complaint about it.

Advertisement

The transcript disproved Democrats' theory that Trump was guilty of quid pro quo, but on Wednesday Schiff still said the president's phone call was "damning." Schiff had a similar reaction to reading the whistleblower complaint, calling it "deeply disturbing."

On Thursday, as the chairman was kicking off an Intelligence Committee hearing with Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire, he decided to improvise some parts of the phone transcript.

Schiff later explained that his version of events was simply a "summary of the president's call was meant to be, at least part, in parody."

Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) was having none of it. She didn't wait to call the chairman out until their proceedings had finished. She took him to task right there.

Advertisement

"On page one - and I'm not going to improvise for parody purposes, like the chairman of this committee did," Stefanik said when she began to read the whistleblower complaint. "I'm going to quote it directly."

She went on to read the whistleblower's confession that he or she "was not a direct witness to most of the events described." Still, officials concluded that even though the complainant was relying on secondhand knowledge, it was "credible" enough to investigate.

Nothing she saw in the document convinced her that impeachment is necessary, she noted on Twitter. But the Democrats made it official earlier this week, before they even laid their eyes on the phone transcript. An impeachment inquiry is happening.

President Trump seems to know what's really going on.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement