The One Question the Media Wouldn't Ask at the White House Press Briefing...
Here's the Question That Really Got Under Tim Walz's Skin
Yet Another Liberal Media Narrative Just Crumbled
This State Is Suing Roblox for Allowing Child Predators to Run Rampant on...
Who Is James Talarico?
Footage Shows Black Lives Matter Leader Literally Under Assault for Mishandling Donation M...
Senator Kennedy Shares His Honest, and Funny, Thoughts on the Death of Khamenei
Nancy Mace Just Walloped Tim Walz in a Hearing About Minnesota's Rampant Fraud
Whoopi Goldberg Is Left Speechless When Confronted With the Reality of Women in...
Would SCOTUS Ruling on Marijuana Users' Gun Rights Help Hunter Biden?
Registered Child Sex Offender Running for Fresno City Council, Holds Event Outside Element...
Marco Rubio Fires Back at Critics of Operation Epic Fury: Let Me Explain...
The Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Victory on Immigration
Iran's Last Hope Is American Division
Democrats Lie and Slander U.S. to Stop Commander in Chief
Tipsheet

John Roberts Joins Liberal Justices in Ruling on Louisiana Abortion Law

John Roberts Joins Liberal Justices in Ruling on Louisiana Abortion Law
AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley

Late Thursday night, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a bill in Louisiana that would have enforced more abortion restrictions. In the 5-4 ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts joined with his liberal colleagues on the court.

Advertisement

The state law requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals, a demand that some argued would have shuttered multiple abortion clinics.

Pro-abortion advocates cheered the court's tight ruling and noted how both of President Trump's Supreme Court picks dissented.

In his dissent, newest Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh said the court ruled prematurely. Slate interpreted that to mean he is, indeed, "declaring war on Roe v. Wade."

Meanwhile, the law's pro-life proponents are hoping to appeal the decision.

Roberts voted in favor of a similar abortion law in Texas in 2016. The court struck that law down in the case Whole Woman's Health vs. Hellerstedt, arguing it would be an undue burden on women. Roberts issued a dissent at the time. This time, however, it seems he decided to vote via precedent.

Advertisement

As some conservatives noted, the math just doesn't add up.

Of course, he was also a conservative spoiler during the whole Obamacare individual mandate debate in 2012.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement