Did Marjorie Taylor Greene Tip Off Leftists About Where Trump Was Eating...
The Washington Post's Pushed a Massive LIE About the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis
Did the Face of Somali Daycare Fraud in Minnesota Shut Down?
Hilton Hotel Worker in Texas Who Warned About ICE Presence on Social Media...
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting Is No More
Israeli Military Intelligence Gave a Shocking Update on the Iran Protests
America vs. F**K YOU!
You'll Never Guess Who This CNN Host Thinks the 'Actual Victims' of the...
Indiana Credit Union CEO Sentenced to Federal Prison in $285K Bank Fraud Scheme
Why Did Democrat Senator Ruben Gallego Just Lie About This ICE Officer?
Illegal Immigrant Used Stolen Identity to Vote in Multiple U.S. Elections, Feds Say
Detroit Teen Faces up to $5M Fine, 40 Years in Prison After Guilty...
The Portland Police Chief Is Shedding Tears for Venezuelan Gang Members Shot by...
A Judge Is Blocking Trump From Stopping Payments to Daycare Fraudsters
WHOOPS: Leftists Stage Massive Anti-ICE Protest Outside of the Wrong Hotel
Tipsheet

John Roberts Joins Liberal Justices in Ruling on Louisiana Abortion Law

AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley

Late Thursday night, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a bill in Louisiana that would have enforced more abortion restrictions. In the 5-4 ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts joined with his liberal colleagues on the court.

Advertisement

The state law requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals, a demand that some argued would have shuttered multiple abortion clinics.

Pro-abortion advocates cheered the court's tight ruling and noted how both of President Trump's Supreme Court picks dissented.

In his dissent, newest Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh said the court ruled prematurely. Slate interpreted that to mean he is, indeed, "declaring war on Roe v. Wade."

Meanwhile, the law's pro-life proponents are hoping to appeal the decision.

Roberts voted in favor of a similar abortion law in Texas in 2016. The court struck that law down in the case Whole Woman's Health vs. Hellerstedt, arguing it would be an undue burden on women. Roberts issued a dissent at the time. This time, however, it seems he decided to vote via precedent.

Advertisement

As some conservatives noted, the math just doesn't add up.

Of course, he was also a conservative spoiler during the whole Obamacare individual mandate debate in 2012.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement