Living in the Lib Bubble Makes Them Lose
It Seems Like Dems Are Struggling to Handle the Chaos Created by Unterscharführer...
Why a Former SC State Rep Vented About the Supreme Court Ruling on...
Jill Biden's Answer to This Question About the 2024 Election IS NOT What...
Why Graham Platner Had to Return to Maine Quickly Last Night
The Dems Suffering Through Another Wave of Biden-Induced Political Nausea. That's Such a...
We Knew the LA Mayor's Results Wouldn't Be Called, but These Drunk Pratt...
CENTCOM Disabled a 'Non-Compliant' Vessel in the Arabian Gulf
A Milwaukee Husband and Father Was Beaten to Death by a Career Criminal
Francesca Hong Wants to Control Wisconsin's Budget, but Can't Seem to Manage Her...
The Collapse Was Not an Accident
Difficult Freedom or Easy Tyranny: Which Will America Choose?
John Cornyn Is Crashing Out Over His Horrendous Electoral Loss
Playing With Fire – Tehran's Deadly Gambit As Economic Collapse Looms
Europe Needs Patriotism
Tipsheet

Schumer: Kavanaugh Let Nixon 'Off the Hook'...Wouldn't He Do the Same for Trump?

Schumer: Kavanaugh Let Nixon 'Off the Hook'...Wouldn't He Do the Same for Trump?

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is making good on his promise to use "everything he's got" to stop the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. The Democrat has been highlighting the nominee's past opinions to try and prove Kavanaugh would protect presidents at all cost, even if that means obstructing investigations. Schumer's latest case in point is United States vs. Nixon, the 1974 Supreme Court case that required President Nixon to turn over the subpoenaed Watergate recordings.

Advertisement

At a panel discussion in 1999, Kavanaugh openly wondered whether "the tensions of the time" had led to an "erroneous decision" in that case. Schumer pounced on that comment. 

"If Kavanaugh would've let Nixon off the hook, what is he willing to do for President Trump?" Schumer asked.

“According to his own words, Brett Kavanaugh even believes the 8-0 decision that held Richard Nixon accountable was wrongly decided,”  Schumer added in his statement. “It bodes very poorly for any decision that [Kavanaugh] might make to hold President Trump accountable.”

Carrie Severino, writing at National Review, put several holes in that allegation. She pointed out that a year before that panel discussion on Watergate, Kavanaugh wrote in the Georgetown Law Journal that the decision to demand the Watergate tapes of Nixon “reflects the proper balance of the President’s need for confidentiality and the government’s interest in obtaining all relevant evidence for criminal proceedings.” That opinion appears to have stuck with him in recent years. In a 2015 speech at Catholic University’s Columbus School of Law, Kavanaugh said that United States v. Nixon is an example of judicial "backbone" and is one of the “greatest moments in judicial history.”

Advertisement

Still, other Democrats have tried to claim that Kavanaugh believes presidents are above the law because of his comments on independent counsels. Guy explained in a recent piece why Democrats are again stretching for a reason to demonize his character. While the Supreme Court nominee has written that presidents deserve to be shielded from criminal and civil prosecutions while serving, he has added that once he or she is out of office, those wanting to pursue prosecution should by all means proceed. Kavanaugh has also noted that if the president's behavior is particularly troublesome, Congress always has the option to pursue impeachment.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement