Anyone Catch CNN's Embarrassing Error About the J6 Pipe Bomb Suspect?
Dan Bongino Wonders Why the FBI Seemingly Stopped Looking for the J6 Bomb...
People Are Driving to Tim Walz's House and Calling Him This...It's Hilarious
Grand Jury Rejects Another Indictment Against Letitia James
Another Afghan National Was Busted for Allegedly Plotting a Mass Shooting
Media Gaslighting Works: Only a Quarter of Voters Know Kirk’s Assassin Was a...
What Is Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers Hiding About State SNAP Recipients?
Did Rep. Jim Himes Really Try to Make Martyrs Out of Narco-Terrorists?
Democrats Say Aftyn Behn Is the Future of Their Party? We're Fine With...
MS NOW Melts Down After SCOTUS Hands Texas Redistricting Win
Keith Ellison Has No Regrets About His Handling of the Feeding Our Future...
A Five-Point Plan for Republicans Heading Into 2026
Gavin Newsom Wants Democrats to Be More 'Culturally Normal'
Far-Left Commentator Mocks White Culture, Says U.S. Would Become a ‘Sh*thole’ Without Immi...
A Left-Wing Heckler Called Tom Homan a 'Racist' and a 'Traitor.' Here's What...
Tipsheet

Dem Senator Shares His Idea for Assault Weapons Buy-Back Program

Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA), like many gun control activists, wants "assault weapons" off the street. His proposal is a bit more radical, however. Instead of just a tired old ban, he is suggesting a buy back program. He shared his idea in an op-ed for USA Today.

Advertisement

Reinstating the federal assault weapons ban that was in effect from 1994 to 2004 would prohibit manufacture and sales, but it would not affect weapons already possessed. This would leave millions of assault weapons in our communities for decades to come.

Instead, we should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons. The ban would not apply to law enforcement agencies or shooting clubs. (USA Today)

He uses Australia as precedent.

Australia got it right. After a man used military-style weapons to kill 35 people in April 1996, that nation adopted strict new measures and bought back 643,726 newly illegal rifles and shotguns at market value. The cost — an estimated $230 million in U.S. dollars at the time — was funded by a temporary 0.2% tax levy on national health insurance.

Swalwell notes that for U.S. to employ the same system, the price would be a bit steeper. If the government offers $200 to buy back the estimated 15 million assault weapons in the country, for instance, it would cost $3 billion.

It's a hefty sum, but "what is it worth to American taxpayers to not see our families, friends and neighbors cut down in a hail of gunfire?" Swalwell asks. "Consider this an investment in averting carnage and heartache and loss." 

Advertisement

The shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in February, in which 17 innocent students and faculty members lost their lives, Swalwell argues, demands a drastic change.

"The Parkland teens have taught us there is no right more important than every student's right to come home after class," he writes. "The right to live is supreme over any other."

Parkland students like David Hogg have come to the same conclusion - gun control is the answer. Oh and the NRA is the enemy. Yet, some of his peers and some of the victims' families believe the problem lies in law enforcement. Footage during the shooting proves that a few armed deputies failed to act for minutes. Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel said it's not his fault. Andrew Pollack, a father whose daughter was killed in the Parkland shooting, has filed a wrongful death suit against one of the deputies and local mental health facilities who he says should have known how much of a threat the shooter posed to the community.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement