Immigration Judge Blocks DHS Effort to Deport Student for Criticizing Israel
US Attorney Asks Judge to Dismiss Indictment Against Steve Bannon
Jasmine Crockett Shows Just How Low Democrats Are Willing to Go to Attack...
Scott Jennings: Democrats Are Losing the Voter ID Argument
Guess Why This Kentucky Judge Gave an Unrepentant Criminal a Lighter Sentence
A Boy Has Stolen Another Girls' Championship Title
Dozens of Detransitioners Have Filed Lawsuits, and the Costs Could End 'Gender-Affirming C...
While Homeless New Yorkers Freeze, the NYT Wants Us to Know This About...
Sen. Warren Repeats Debunked Lie About Women and the SAVE Act
We Must Not Submit to 'Diversity'
A Maryland Squatter Walks Free — and Here's What Her Attorney Had...
AWFUL Who Harassed Yoga Studio Employees Over ICE Earned Herself a Ban
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Trump Targets Obama’s Climate 'Endangerment Finding' in Sweeping Rollback of Emissions Rul...
Steve Hilton Isn’t Even Governor Yet, and He’s Already Exposing California Welfare Fraud
Tipsheet

Planned Parenthood Targets Trump's Judicial Nominees for Being Male

Planned Parenthood does not approve of President Trump's judicial nominees because, well, they're majority male. The organization's president Cecile Richards posted an opinion piece on her Facebook page written by Linda Greenhouse of The New York Times. Greenhouse begins the op-ed by blasting the Trump White House for waging a "war on abortion," and evolves to her remarking on the administration's "war on birth control." 

Advertisement

The lack of diversity among Trump nominees may explain why the administration has been hostile to the two illegal immigrant teenagers who have been trying to get an abortion? 

Does the fact that these two judges are women make them more sensitive to the plaintiffs’ claims in these cases? I don’t know, but I do know that 81 percent of President Trump’s judicial nominees are men (including the three whose nominations cratered during the past week.) Does the fact that neither judge is white make them more skeptical of “because we’re the executive branch and we say so” legal arguments? (Judge Chutkan was born in Jamaica, and Judge Beetlestone was born in Nigeria.) I don’t know that either, but I do know that a mere 2 percent of the Trump administration’s nominees are nonwhite women. His nominees are the least diverse in decades. (New York Times)

This argument may sound sexist, but radical abortion advocates do not care about gender when it comes to protecting abortion rights, LifeNews notes.

"Trump and his conservative nominees pose a threat to the abortion industry’s future," LifeNews contributor Micaiah Bilger writes. "And that’s what really is worrying Planned Parenthood."

Despite his breaking a record for appellate court confirmations in his first year, Trump has had to watch some of his nominees be subjected to religious litmus tests by Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Having read some of judicial nominee Amy Coney Barrett's former speeches, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) was concerned by her pro-life language, as she shared during Barrett's confirmation hearing in September.

Advertisement

Related:

PRESIDENT TRUMP

"The dogma lives loudly within you," Feinstein had the nerve to tell the nominee.

Barrett was confirmed to the 7th Circuit Court despite the Democrats' interrogation of her and her Catholic faith. Others followed. Omaha attorney Steve Grasz, nominated for the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, was also grilled about his faith and how he could judge objectively.

As each nominee in the hot seat has explained, they will follow the law, not their ideologies.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos