That Jesse Jackson Memorial Service Was a Gathering of the Worst People
Behold the Hypocritical Virginia Democrats
The Covenant Endures: Israel, Iran, and the Test of American Leadership
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 310: 'What Wonderous Love Is This'
Anchors Aweigh!
Trump Says He Won't Sign Any New Legislation Until the SAVE Act Is...
Former Carlyle Police Chief Accused of Spending Taxpayer Monday on WNBA Tickets, Jewelry
Chicago-Area Convenience Store Owner Sentenced to 4 Years in WIC Fraud Scheme
A Pair of Terrorists Targeted an Anti-Islam Protest. You Won't Believe How the...
Arizona Governor Vetoes Bill Honoring Charlie Kirk
James Talarico’s Time
Iranian Women’s Courage Must Not Be Forgotten on International Women’s Day, Part 2
The Money Doesn’t Lie: Trump Supports Families; Big Abortion Supports Itself
Husbands, Love Your Wives As Christ Loved the Church
The US-UK Relationship in Crisis: Iran Is Only the Latest Problem
Tipsheet

NYT Explains Why Democrats' Judicial Complaints Matter More than Republicans'

NYT Explains Why Democrats' Judicial Complaints Matter More than Republicans'

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, as I wrote Thursday, is considering ending the blue slip process for judicial nominees. The blue slip allows senators to block the president's nominees. Dozens of Democrats have now chosen to withhold their blue slips, most recently Minnesota Sen. Al Franken, and McConnell is ready to make it merely a symbolic gesture.

Advertisement

The New York Times editorial board are now accusing the Senate leader of hypocrisy, reminding readers that back when he was in the minority party, McConnell was happy to employ the use of blue slips.

Republican senators exploited their blue slips with abandon, and with little or no explanation. One senator blocked a nominee because she had once said the Constitution did not protect an individual right to bear arms — an accurate description of the uncertainty about the law at the time. Other senators blocked nominees they had previously approved for other courts, or even recommended to the White House themselves. In all, 18 of Mr. Obama’s judicial nominees were scuttled, including six to the Courts of Appeals. That’s not counting dozens more vacancies that languished for years without a nominee because senators made it clear they would object to anyone.

"It’s particularly rich, if not surprising," for McConnell to now wanting to upend the blue slip system, the editors add.

The NYT goes on to acknowledge that Democrats are now engaging in the same form of obstructionism. However, the difference is that the Democrats supposedly have legitimate complaints with the justices that Trump has nominated, whereas the Republicans were on a fool's errand.

Unlike their Republican counterparts, however, these Democrats provided a clear explanation for their opposition: The White House, they said, made no meaningful effort to consult with them before making nominations. Mr. Wyden and Mr. Merkley said Mr. Trump had completely bypassed Oregon’s well-established bipartisan selection committee.

Advertisement

In this "toxic, hyperpartisan age," Trump has an obligation to seek the advice of the Senate, the editors insist. He received 3 million fewer popular votes than Hillary Clinton, so the least he can do is listen to the opposing party, they add.

I wonder why he wouldn't want to seek the advice of Democrats on his judicial nominations after dozens refused to even acknowledge his election victory. Some didn't even consider him legitimate.

However, it seems Trump is warming up to Democratic leadership in other areas, namely the debt and illegal immigration. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement