Deputy HHS Secretary to Minnesota: 'We Have Turned Off the Money Spigot'
Israel's Foreign Ministry Had the Perfect Tweet for This Story Involving Greta Thunberg
CBS News Investigated Somali Daycare Centers After a YouTuber's Video Went Viral. Here's...
FBI Says It Thwarted a Planned ISIS-Style Terror Plot Ahead of New Year's...
A Judge, a Technicality, and the Fight Over What We Feed Our Kids
Judicial Lessons From the Hannah Dugan Verdict
Wisconsin Gov. Evers Laments Healthcare Costs While Suing to Protect ‘Gender-Affirming’ Ca...
The Heckler Awards, Part 4 – The Continued Celebration of the Bottom of...
The Economists Got 2025 All Wrong
Peace Through Strength: US Military Surpasses Recruitment Goals Under Trump-Era Policies
Scott Jennings Blasts California’s Wealth Tax As Cover-Up for the States $70B Fraud...
Mamdani to Be Inaugurated in Subway Station Built by Entrepreneurs and the Free...
Jessica Tarlov Shocked a 'Kid' Was Able to Expose $100 Million in Fraud...
Tim Walz Says He Takes Fraud Seriously After Keith Ellison Vowed to Fight...
Another Leftist Judge Is Blocking Trump's Deportations
Tipsheet

New Ad Suggests Franken Is Refusing to Support Judicial Nominee Who Is More 'Popular' than Him

The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board is taking Franken to task for his "petty" obstructionism. The Minnesota Democrat is refusing to hand over his "blue slip" in consideration for the nomination of Justice David Stras to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Senators who hold on to their blue slips can block votes on nominees to the lower federal courts from their home state, the WSJ explains. It has become a growing trend in the Trump era.

Advertisement

The editors mock the senator's use of the Franken Role Model Standard. All Stras is guilty of is speaking at conservative functions and "daring" to praise the late Antonin Scalia.

Mr. Franken claims instead that Judge Stras is unfit by virtue of his role models. The Senator is offended that the judge early in his career “worked as a law clerk for Justice [ Clarence ] Thomas,” and that he even once described that Supreme Court Justice as a “mentor.” Judge Stras also dared to speak at a Federalist Society event, where he “talked about how the jurisprudence of Justice [Antonin] Scalia helped to shape his own views.” Shocking stuff.

Under this Franken Role Model Standard, Democrats are justified in opposing any nominee who admires any widely esteemed Senate-confirmed Supreme Court Justice that he doesn’t like. Perhaps he thinks the late Justice Scalia wrote too well and was too intelligent to be Mr. Franken’s idea of a judicial model.

Advertisement

Judicial Crisis Network had other inclinations as to why Franken is blocking such a qualified nominee. In a new ad that aired Wednesday, the group claims that Franken is refusing to support Stras because he loses to him in a popularity contest. For instance, Judge Stras is highly esteemed by the American Bar Association and enjoys bipartisan support.

Is Franken jealous of someone more popular, the ad wonders.


Chairman Grassley shouldn't put up with all this "nonsense," the WSJ editors write.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement