House Votes to End the Partial Shutdown by a Razor-Thin Margin
This GOP Candidate Is Taking On Tarrant County’s Power Brokers
Jill Biden's Ex-Husband Charged for Murdering His Wife
American Society of Plastic Surgeons Opposes 'Gender Affirming' Surgeries for Children
Roger Goodell Punts on Political Halftime Show
Report: TMZ Allegedly Received a Ransom Note for Missing Nancy Guthrie
ICE Arrests Illegal Immigrant Who Was Hired by the New Orleans Police Department
Minnesota Family Decides to Self-Deport, Proving Trump's Immigration Policies Are Working
Another Race Hoax Just Lost in a Texas Court
How You Know Chicago Isn't That Worried About 'Gun Violence'
Fellow Democratic Socialist Slams Mayor Mamdani as Storm Blackouts Leave Thousands Without...
Greg Gutfeld Blasts Hollywood and Billie Eilish for Their Hypocrisy and Disconnect From...
Liberal College Student Gets a Lesson in Taxpayer Responsibility, as She Debates SNAP...
Major Builders Announce 'Trump Homes' to Solve Affordability Crisis for First-Time Buyers
DOJ Launches Investigation Into California Catholic School Desecrated and Destroyed by Van...
Tipsheet

New Ad Suggests Franken Is Refusing to Support Judicial Nominee Who Is More 'Popular' than Him

The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board is taking Franken to task for his "petty" obstructionism. The Minnesota Democrat is refusing to hand over his "blue slip" in consideration for the nomination of Justice David Stras to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Senators who hold on to their blue slips can block votes on nominees to the lower federal courts from their home state, the WSJ explains. It has become a growing trend in the Trump era.

Advertisement

The editors mock the senator's use of the Franken Role Model Standard. All Stras is guilty of is speaking at conservative functions and "daring" to praise the late Antonin Scalia.

Mr. Franken claims instead that Judge Stras is unfit by virtue of his role models. The Senator is offended that the judge early in his career “worked as a law clerk for Justice [ Clarence ] Thomas,” and that he even once described that Supreme Court Justice as a “mentor.” Judge Stras also dared to speak at a Federalist Society event, where he “talked about how the jurisprudence of Justice [Antonin] Scalia helped to shape his own views.” Shocking stuff.

Under this Franken Role Model Standard, Democrats are justified in opposing any nominee who admires any widely esteemed Senate-confirmed Supreme Court Justice that he doesn’t like. Perhaps he thinks the late Justice Scalia wrote too well and was too intelligent to be Mr. Franken’s idea of a judicial model.

Advertisement

Judicial Crisis Network had other inclinations as to why Franken is blocking such a qualified nominee. In a new ad that aired Wednesday, the group claims that Franken is refusing to support Stras because he loses to him in a popularity contest. For instance, Judge Stras is highly esteemed by the American Bar Association and enjoys bipartisan support.

Is Franken jealous of someone more popular, the ad wonders.


Chairman Grassley shouldn't put up with all this "nonsense," the WSJ editors write.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos