We Know Who Will Be Competing for Georgia's Senate Seat and Governor's Mansion...
All Eyes on Georgia and Alabama Tonight
Here's What Happened During JD Vance's Appearance on The View
You'll Never Guess Why This Guy Burned a Cross in a Chicago Park
Daily Beast Cites the 'Scandal' of a Comedian Attending a UFC Fight; Press...
The Great Escape—Let Young Workers Out of Social Security
Here's What Was Just Revealed About One of the Alleged UFC Freedom 250...
There's a Ridiculous Bill Set to Make It's Way Through the California State...
One Israeli Strike Could Bring the New Iran Deal Crashing Down
Look Who These Democrats Are Supporting in the World Cup. Hint: It's Not...
California Requires Proof That You're Gay to Get These Taxpayer-Funded Contracts
James Talarico Got Paid Tens of Thousands of Dollars by a Firm That...
Peer Review Exposes Fatal Flaws in Study That Claimed 'Anti-Trans' Laws Spiked Teen...
DOJ Charges 15 Antifa Members After Violence Against ICE in Minneapolis
School Pays $95,000 After Punishing Student for Charlie Kirk Tribute
Tipsheet

SCOTUS Rules North Carolina Gerrymandering Is Racist

SCOTUS Rules North Carolina Gerrymandering Is Racist

The Supreme Court has ruled that Republican lawmakers intentionally redrew congressional maps in North Carolina to disadvantage African-American voters after the 2010 census. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the 5-3 decision.

Advertisement

The North Carolina ruling upheld a federal district court decision that struck down the state's 1st and 12th congressional districts because state lawmakers had packed African American voters into them, thereby minimizing the influence of black voters in other districts. Kagan said the 1st district "produced boundaries amplifying divisions between blacks and whites," while in the 12th, "race, not politics, accounted for the district's reconfiguration."

Justice Clarence Thomas joined the four liberal justices in the majority.

In his dissent, Justice Samuel Alito argued race was not a consideration in the North Carolina lawmakers' redistricting.

"Partisan gerrymandering is always unsavory, but that is not the issue here," he wrote. "The issue is whether District 12 was drawn predominantly because of race. The record shows that it was not."

The Supreme Court also decided not to hear a case last week on the North Carolina voter ID law. That meant that the federal appeals court ruling, which determined the voting requirements were discriminatory, would stand.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement