All Eyes on Georgia and Alabama Tonight
Here's What Happened During JD Vance's Appearance on The View
You'll Never Guess Why This Guy Burned a Cross in a Chicago Park
This Top SPLC Official Funneled Over $1 Million to Her Neo-Nazi Lover
The Great Escape—Let Young Workers Out of Social Security
Here's What Was Just Revealed About One of the Alleged UFC Freedom 250...
There's a Ridiculous Bill Set to Make It's Way Through the California State...
One Israeli Strike Could Bring the New Iran Deal Crashing Down
Iran Will Be Allowed to Immediately Resume Selling Its Oil Under Latest Deal,...
Peer Review Exposes Fatal Flaws in Study That Claimed 'Anti-Trans' Laws Spiked Teen...
DOJ Charges 15 Antifa Members After Violence Against ICE in Minneapolis
School Pays $95,000 After Punishing Student for Charlie Kirk Tribute
How a Calmer Border Is Helping Better Fight New World Screwworm
Gay Adoptive Fathers Found Guilty of Sexually Abusing, Murdering 13-Month-Old Baby Boy
Hillary Clinton Torches Biden Over 'Terrible Mistake'
Tipsheet

Appeals Court Rules Against Trump's Immigration EO, Upholds Restraining Order

Appeals Court Rules Against Trump's Immigration EO, Upholds Restraining Order

UPDATE: Trump has responded, in all caps.

***Original Post***

Advertisement

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against the Trump administration's favor in regards to the president's immigration executive order, which temporarily bans visitors from seven nations in the Middle East and Africa. With their decision, the three-judge panel upheld Seattle Judge James Robart's nationwide injunction against the law.

Two-thirds of the panel was reportedly concerned that the law was intended to discriminate based on a religion.

During oral arguments Tuesday night, DOJ attorney August Flentje pushed back against claims that Trump's order was a Muslim ban, pointing out that the seven nations listed on the executive order originated in the Obama administration. He also insisted that Trump was acting in accordance with the Constitution.

Advertisement

"This is a traditional national security judgment that is assigned to the political branches and the President and the court's order immediately altered that," Flentje argued.

In a speech to law enforcement officials on Wednesday, Trump defended his executive order by reading federal law and urged the appeals court to act fast in the name of national security.

With this ruling, expect the Trump administration to bring this issue to the Supreme Court.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement