C-Span Caller Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About How the Left Feels...
Another Poll Shows Kamala Picked the Wrong Horse in Tim Walz
Trump Proposed the Idea. Now a House Democrat Has Introduced Legislation in Support...
Republicans Who Helped Sink Johnson's Funding Bill Explain Their Votes
Triggered by This Satirical Video, Newsom 'Makes Parody Illegal' in California
Army’s Attacks on Religious Liberty Are Detrimental to the Warrior Ethos
Gallup: Significant Swing in Trump and Harris Favorability
Getting a ‘Deal Done’ Is Not a Foreign Policy
A Democrat Suggested a Republican Rep Was ‘Racist’ Because He Wants a Secure...
'Crisis After Crisis': Oversight Committee Releases Damning Memo on Biden-Harris Administr...
Since 2009, Dems Have Been Dividing America, and the Country Wrestles With Another...
'Candygram for Hezbollah, Candygram for Hezbollah….'
The Haitian Horror Story No One's Talking About
We Are Letting Others Control Our Devices and Thus Our Lives
Epistemology Politicized
Tipsheet

DOJ Sides With North Carolina NAACP in Voter Registration Lawsuit

Last week, the North Carolina NAACP accused the state of discriminating against minority voters by canceling over 100 voter registrations. County officials voided these registrations because mailings were being returned as undeliverable. Yet, the NAACP claims their action was in violation of the National Voting Registration Act and has decided to pursue a lawsuit.

Advertisement

The group has found support from the Obama administration's Department of Justice. The agency agrees that the county election boards are clearly in violation of the NVRA.

“[T]he purge program at issue here rested on a mass mailing and the silence of voters largely unaware of the potential injury to their voting rights," the DOJ said in a statement. "A perfunctory administrative proceeding to consider evidence produced by a mass mailing does not turn an otherwise prohibited systematic process into an ‘individualized’ removal.”

The DOJ argues that undeliverable mail may not exactly mean that an individual’s change in residence impacts their eligibility to vote. The election officials are expected to obtain evidence, per the NVRA.

“Election officials must send the voter the opportunity to confirm or rebut evidence of a possible change of residence that would render the voter ineligible to vote in the jurisdiction.” 

Advertisement

Such “second-hand evidence” does not justify the cancellation of voter eligibility.

The agency also notes that officials are not permitted to purge voters within 90 days of an election.

An emergency hearing on the lawsuit was scheduled for Wednesday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement