Both These Men Tweeted at the Creator of Dilbert...and Shared a Horrific Fate
Law Professor Responds to Steve Bannon's Criticism of Biden Impeachment Inquiry
Jamaal Bowman's Failure at Reading Comprehension Should Cost Him
The President Who Wasn’t There
Trump and the Revenge Vote
Washington's Credit Card Price Controls Will Hurt Consumers
Honest Talk on Immigration
The Viral Moment From Trump's Civil Fraud Trial
Tucker Carlson Makes a 2024 Prediction
Pentagon Official Charged With Running Dogfighting Ring
Is the Republican Race Finished? Is America?
The Trump Bullet Train to Nowhere Good
A Congressman Got Carjacked in DC Last Night
With Pretrial Ruling on Trump’s Businesses, Judges Eviscerate the Law to Take Down...
Republicans’ Game Plan for Success: How Football Can Help the GOP Win Gen...
Tipsheet

DOJ Sides With North Carolina NAACP in Voter Registration Lawsuit

Last week, the North Carolina NAACP accused the state of discriminating against minority voters by canceling over 100 voter registrations. County officials voided these registrations because mailings were being returned as undeliverable. Yet, the NAACP claims their action was in violation of the National Voting Registration Act and has decided to pursue a lawsuit.

Advertisement

The group has found support from the Obama administration's Department of Justice. The agency agrees that the county election boards are clearly in violation of the NVRA.

“[T]he purge program at issue here rested on a mass mailing and the silence of voters largely unaware of the potential injury to their voting rights," the DOJ said in a statement. "A perfunctory administrative proceeding to consider evidence produced by a mass mailing does not turn an otherwise prohibited systematic process into an ‘individualized’ removal.”

The DOJ argues that undeliverable mail may not exactly mean that an individual’s change in residence impacts their eligibility to vote. The election officials are expected to obtain evidence, per the NVRA.

“Election officials must send the voter the opportunity to confirm or rebut evidence of a possible change of residence that would render the voter ineligible to vote in the jurisdiction.” 

Advertisement

Such “second-hand evidence” does not justify the cancellation of voter eligibility.

The agency also notes that officials are not permitted to purge voters within 90 days of an election.

An emergency hearing on the lawsuit was scheduled for Wednesday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement