Over 800 Google Workers Demand the Company Cut Ties With ICE
UNL Student Government Passes SJP-Backed Israel Divestment Resolution
AOC Mourns the Loss of ’Our Media,’ More Layoffs Across the Industry (and...
The Left Just Doesn't Understand Why WaPo Is Failing
16 Years and $16 Billion Later the First Railhead Goes Down for CA's...
New Musical Remakes Anne Frank As a Genderqueer Hip-Hop Star
Toledo Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Vice President JD Vance During Ohio...
Fort Lauderdale Financial Advisor Sentenced to 20 Years for $94M International Ponzi Schem...
FCC Is Reportedly Investigating The View
Illegal Immigrant Allegedly Used Stolen Identity to Vote and Collect $400K in Federal...
$26 Billion Gone: Stellantis Joins Automakers Retreating From EVs
House Oversight Chair: Clintons Don’t Get Special Treatment in Epstein Probe
Utah Man Sentenced for Stealing Funds Meant to Aid Ukrainian First Responders
Ex-Bank Employee Pleads Guilty to Laundering $8M for Overseas Criminal Organization
State Department Orders Evacuation of US Citizens in Iran As Possibility of Military...
Tipsheet

Will Including Women in Combat Roles Make Male Servicemen 'Less Special'?

That’s the concern voiced by Megan MacKenzie, author of “Beyond the Band of Brothers: the US Military and the Myth that Women Can’t Fight.”

“They feel what makes them special is being all male, and somehow integrating women is going to make them less special and less adept.”

Advertisement

Earlier this month, the Pentagon announced it was opening all U.S. military combat roles to women. While many praised the administration for this equal opportunity for women who want to serve our country, others were not so sure it was a great idea. A survey of special operation forces released shortly after the announcement revealed that a sizable majority, 85.6 percent, opposed the move. Their reasoning ranged from lower standards, to the threatening of male camaraderie:

The focus group responses show concern about lower standards, unit morale, political motives and accusations of sexual assault, among other issues. The 292-page study includes statements of vehement opposition from across the military’s branches. 

“It’s a slap in the face telling us that chicks can do our job,” one Army Ranger said.
“It’s not the physical aspect that bothers me. My issues are morale and retention. This wouldn’t be special to anyone anymore.”

Their hesitations about women in combat are shared by some members of Congress. Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA), for one, warned that allowing women to all military occupations means they would be potentially required to sign up for future drafts:

Advertisement

“If this goes through, it’s going to be mandated that women be drafted,” said Rep. Duncan Hunter of California, a Marine Corps veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan — and who maintains that women should still be barred from some combat roles. “If you’re going to have women in infantry units, if a draft ever occurred, America needs to realize that its daughters and sisters would be included."


Overturning the ban on women from certain combat roles was one of a few major changes to our military since President Obama has taken office. A few years ago, he repealed the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy that prohibited gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military.

No matter what policies are implemented or reversed, I think we can agree that any American who wants to serve his or her country deserves our admiration.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement