The Democrats Want to Cheat
We Know Why CNN Refused to Air Trump's Election Interference Speech
Why the Left's Reaction to Trump's Election Interference Speech Was Amusing
Watch These GOP Reps Cook a Dem Senator Over Her Ludicrous Remarks About...
Maine Senate Race Shows Democrats Are Determined to Grant Illegal Aliens Amnesty
What Could Possibly Go Wrong With Mamdani's Plan for Free City-Run Babysitting?
This AZ Democrat's Congressional Campaign Just Went Off the Rails
Mamdani's Housing Event Just Found a New Form of 'Violence.' Guess What It...
Possible Platner Replacement Ashley Webb Wants Men in Women's Bathrooms
Here's What Milton Friedman Understood About Wealth, Self-Interest, and Profit That We've...
Chevron Just Joined the Race to Bypass the Strait of Hormuz
Trump Demands Accountability As Canadian Wildfire Smoke Hits America
Here's When Lindsey Graham's Funeral Will Be
Historic Flooding Causes Bridge Collapse in Texas Hill Country
FIFA World Cup Drone Incident Leads to ICE Arrest
Tipsheet

Will Including Women in Combat Roles Make Male Servicemen 'Less Special'?

Will Including Women in Combat Roles Make Male Servicemen 'Less Special'?

That’s the concern voiced by Megan MacKenzie, author of “Beyond the Band of Brothers: the US Military and the Myth that Women Can’t Fight.”

“They feel what makes them special is being all male, and somehow integrating women is going to make them less special and less adept.”

Advertisement

Earlier this month, the Pentagon announced it was opening all U.S. military combat roles to women. While many praised the administration for this equal opportunity for women who want to serve our country, others were not so sure it was a great idea. A survey of special operation forces released shortly after the announcement revealed that a sizable majority, 85.6 percent, opposed the move. Their reasoning ranged from lower standards, to the threatening of male camaraderie:

The focus group responses show concern about lower standards, unit morale, political motives and accusations of sexual assault, among other issues. The 292-page study includes statements of vehement opposition from across the military’s branches. 

“It’s a slap in the face telling us that chicks can do our job,” one Army Ranger said.
“It’s not the physical aspect that bothers me. My issues are morale and retention. This wouldn’t be special to anyone anymore.”

Their hesitations about women in combat are shared by some members of Congress. Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA), for one, warned that allowing women to all military occupations means they would be potentially required to sign up for future drafts:

Advertisement

“If this goes through, it’s going to be mandated that women be drafted,” said Rep. Duncan Hunter of California, a Marine Corps veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan — and who maintains that women should still be barred from some combat roles. “If you’re going to have women in infantry units, if a draft ever occurred, America needs to realize that its daughters and sisters would be included."


Overturning the ban on women from certain combat roles was one of a few major changes to our military since President Obama has taken office. A few years ago, he repealed the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy that prohibited gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military.

No matter what policies are implemented or reversed, I think we can agree that any American who wants to serve his or her country deserves our admiration.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement