This Thread of Libs Melting Down Over The Washington Post Not Endorsing Kamala...
Here's What a Shark Tank Host Said About Kamala That Caused a Total...
Now We’ll Never Know Who The Washington Post Supports
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 239: What the Bible Says About Truth –...
The Great Gaslight About the Great Replacement
Trump Takes an Axe to Tax
Exxon Knew! First Warming and Climate, Now Plastics
Turn Off the Politicians and Listen to Yourself
Alive and Ambulatory? Let’s Be Thankful for These Blessings.
Dangerous Words
America’s Greatness Is found in 'One Nation, Under God'
20 Reasons to Vote for Republicans-- and Especially for Donald Trump
Kamala, Jesus, and the Founders
Here’s the Highlights of Joe Rogan’s Three-Hour Interview With Trump
Israel Offers Grim Warning to Iran After Launching Strikes
Tipsheet

Will the California Senate Approve an Assisted-Suicide Bill?

Editor's Note: A previous headline for this article suggested that SB 128 has passed the California Senate. It has not yet passed. Our apologies for the error.

Original piece:

Advertisement

California is one step closer to becoming the sixth state to pass the controversial Death with Dignity bill. The legislation, condemned by many pro-life advocates, allows terminally ill patients to end their lives with a doctor’s prescription.

The California Medical Association, which initially opposed the bill, removed its opposition last week. Soon after, the state Senate appropriations committee approved it.

Similar legislation was just defeated in Scotland.

The debate over assisted suicide reached a climax last year when 29-year-old Brittany Maynard chose to end her life after receiving a fatal diagnosis. She was one of 750 people in Oregon to do so since the state passed the aid in dying law in 1997. The four other states which allow patients to take deadly medication are New Mexico, Montana, Washington, and Vermont.

TIME magazine has a list of factors that explain the divide on the right-to-die issue. On the advocate side are reasons such as retaining one’s autonomy and establishing clear guidelines: “The laws give patients the choice to use aid in dying if their suffering becomes unbearable” and “States that don’t authorize aid in dying have unclear and unenforceable laws.”

Advertisement

Opponents, on the other hand, argue the following: “Once the pills are available, anyone can administer them – particularly if that patient has lost mental and physical faculties – even if that patient has decided against taking the pills” and “It’s often difficult to predict which sick patient is going to die imminently, as opposed to getting better with intensive care.”

No one wants to see a loved one suffer. But, is there not something just inhumane about giving a patient the tools to end their lives? Don't doctors spend years studying medicine and conducting research in order to save lives? 

I hope these California lawmakers reconsider and follow Scotland’s lead.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement