Here's the Video Exposing What NYU's Pro-Hamas Students Really Think
Will Jewish Voters Stop Voting For The Democrats Who Want To Kill Them?
Is Biden Serious With His Victory Lap on 'National Security'?
Someone Has to Be the Adult in the Room: Clear the Quad and...
Our Gallows Hill — The Latest Trump Witch Trial
Adding to the Title IX Law
‘Hush Money’ Case Against Trump Is Bad On The Law and On the...
Stop the 'Emergency Spending' Charade Already
Joe Biden’s Hitler Problem
Universities of America You Are Directly Responsible for the Rise of Jew Hatred...
The 'Belongers', Part II
Banning TikTok a Blow to Free Speech
Human Dreck
Border Crisis Solution - Forget Biden and Speaker Johnson
NPR Whistleblower Highlights Everything Wrong With Journalism Today
Tipsheet

Will the California Senate Approve an Assisted-Suicide Bill?

Editor's Note: A previous headline for this article suggested that SB 128 has passed the California Senate. It has not yet passed. Our apologies for the error.

Original piece:

Advertisement

California is one step closer to becoming the sixth state to pass the controversial Death with Dignity bill. The legislation, condemned by many pro-life advocates, allows terminally ill patients to end their lives with a doctor’s prescription.

The California Medical Association, which initially opposed the bill, removed its opposition last week. Soon after, the state Senate appropriations committee approved it.

Similar legislation was just defeated in Scotland.

The debate over assisted suicide reached a climax last year when 29-year-old Brittany Maynard chose to end her life after receiving a fatal diagnosis. She was one of 750 people in Oregon to do so since the state passed the aid in dying law in 1997. The four other states which allow patients to take deadly medication are New Mexico, Montana, Washington, and Vermont.

TIME magazine has a list of factors that explain the divide on the right-to-die issue. On the advocate side are reasons such as retaining one’s autonomy and establishing clear guidelines: “The laws give patients the choice to use aid in dying if their suffering becomes unbearable” and “States that don’t authorize aid in dying have unclear and unenforceable laws.”

Advertisement

Opponents, on the other hand, argue the following: “Once the pills are available, anyone can administer them – particularly if that patient has lost mental and physical faculties – even if that patient has decided against taking the pills” and “It’s often difficult to predict which sick patient is going to die imminently, as opposed to getting better with intensive care.”

No one wants to see a loved one suffer. But, is there not something just inhumane about giving a patient the tools to end their lives? Don't doctors spend years studying medicine and conducting research in order to save lives? 

I hope these California lawmakers reconsider and follow Scotland’s lead.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement