Comedian Takes Aim at San Francisco's Anarchic Tendencies
You Have to Be an Exceptionally Bad President to Lose Silicon Valley
CBS News Polls the Uninformed, Biden Reads a Kenyan Script, and the Press...
The High Art of Virtue Signaling
Opposition to U.S. Steel Deal is Misguided and Counterproductive
Red States Could End Up Paying for Blue States’ Climate Policies
As AZ Democrats Panic Over the ‘Secure the Border Act,’ Republicans Should Keep...
EVs Should Only Be for Consenting Adults
FIFA Is Latest Target of Palestinian Hijacking
Voters Reject Abortion Extremism from Barrow to Biden
This Mental Health Awareness Month, Let’s Focus on the Harm Social Media is...
Joe Biden's Latest 'Racist' Comment Is Low Even for Him
Pro-Hamas Activist Disgustingly Mocks Rep. Brian Mast for Having No Legs
AOC's Wild Claim of a Second Trump Term Doesn't Add Up
CNN Reporter Shocked By Massive Trump Rally In Deep-Blue State
Tipsheet

UVA Dean Sues Rolling Stone $7.5 Million for Exaggerated Rape Allegations

When you impatiently report on a campus gang rape allegation, fail to interview the accused party and try to portray the school dean as villainous, you’re bound to end up in some hot legal water. That’s where Rolling Stone and writer Sabrina Rubin Erdely find themselves after their botched report on the University of Virginia. UVA’s dean, Nicole Eramo, is now suing the magazine for its misleading coverage.

Advertisement

A University of Virginia associate dean of students filed a multi-million dollar defamation lawsuit against Rolling Stone on Tuesday, alleging that the magazine portrayed her as callous and indifferent to allegations of sexual assault on campus and made her the university’s “chief villain” in a now-debunked story about a fraternity gang rape.

The school is suing Rolling Stone for a cool $7.5 million, demanding justice for a report that severely damaged the school’s reputation. The accused fraternity members weren’t the only ones who suffered. The magazine altered a picture of Dean Eramo to make her seem like a monster too. These unfair characterizations are addressed in the lawsuit.

“Rolling Stone and Erdely’s highly defamatory and false statements about Dean Eramo were not the result of an innocent mistake,” according to the lawsuit, which was filed in Charlottesville Circuit Court. “They were the result of a wanton journalist who was more concerned with writing an article that fulfilled her preconceived narrative about the victimization of women on American college campuses, and a malicious publisher who was more concerned about selling magazines to boost the economic bottom line for its faltering magazine, than they were about discovering the truth or actual facts.”

Advertisement

Erdely’s shoddy journalism was bad enough but, to make matters worse, she faced no repercussions for her actions. As for her “apology,” it was not even directed toward the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity members she tried to excoriate.

Rolling Stone needs to answer for its deeply flawed journalism. Erdely’s report has unnecessarily affected the lives of these young undergraduates and has tainted the world of investigative journalism by publishing a story before she had obtained all the facts.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement