Oh, That's Why a Brown Professor Got Deported
Conservatives Are Sticking Together
Fani Willis Is Going to Pay Big for Violating State Law While Prosecuting...
Appeals Court Rejects Trump's Effort to Reverse Reinstatement of Federal Workers
The Democrats' Latest Strategy Against Trump and Musk Is Failing Miserably
Trump Sends Scathing Message to Houthis and Iran After Airstrikes
DEI-Obsessed Democrats Are Doing This on Purpose
Democrats Are Big Sad About Losing Shutdown Battle, and They Should Be
Is This the Aide Behind Biden's Controversial Autopen Signings?
Bridge in Dublin Features Palestinian Flags for St. Patrick's Day Weekend
Democrat Gov: I Won't Allow Trump to Take Illegal Aliens 'Off the Streets'
Chuck Schumer's Book Tour Postponed
Unnecessary Section 230 Grants Bigger Amnesty Than Biden’s Bogus Family-J6 ‘Pardons’
All of These Polls Have Catastrophic News for Democrats
Bravo: Trump Takes the Gloves Off Against Terrorists
Tipsheet

Indiana Legislators 'Run Out of Time' on Gay Marriage Vote

After three-and-a-half hours of testimony today in Indianapolis, Greg Steuerwald, chairman of the Indiana House Judiciary Committee, decided not to take a vote on HJR-3, a bill that would add a gay marriage ban to the state’s constitution.

Advertisement

From the Indy Star:

Steuerwald said after the hearing that the committee ran out of time before the House was scheduled to convene at 1:30 p.m. and that several committee members told him they "wanted time to reflect on the testimony."

The Hoosier State already has a law that forbids same-sex marriage, yet this amendment would make it more permanent. Steuerwald’s decision to delay the vote also leaves its companion bill in the air -- a measure that states the amendment should not deny employer health benefits to same-sex couples or neglect local ordinances that prohibit discrimination.

During the lengthy debate, HJR-3 opponents warned that the bill could prevent them from attracting students and employees who believe in gay marriage.

Other gay marriage proponents like Freedom Indiana are encouraging Hoosiers to rally against the legislation tonight and “protect Indiana’s families,” claiming the “anti-freedom” amendment would hurt the state’s economy.

However, traditional marriage supporters also have plenty of evidence on their side to suggest a home with both a mother and father is most advantageous for the economy. Statistics show that children in father-absent homes, for instance, are almost four times more likely to be poor than those who live with a mother and father.

Advertisement

But, the best argument of the debate, I thought, required no numbers. Here’s what Glenn Tebbe, executive director of the Indiana Catholic Conference, said when explaining his support for HJR-3:

"It's not in the power of either the church or the state to redefine marriage, as God is its author," he said.

The fate of HJR-3 remains to be seen, but the House and Senate must approve the amendment again before it is placed on the November ballot, when voters will have the final say.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement