They Tried to Kill Trump. Again.
Same Old, Same Old: Target Trump
Democrats Have a Massive Graham Platner Problem
Axios Delivers a ‘Scoop’ With No Information; ABC News Struggles With the Term...
Cole Allen's Lawyer Makes a Bid for Release. Here It Is.
Rep. Wesley Hunt Shuts Down Question on the Declining Number of Black Republicans...
Here's How Justice Thomas Would Have Taken the SCOTUS Voting Rights Act Decision...
This Dem Senator Says the Iranian Regime's 'Death to America' Chants Are Just...
Federal Jury Convicts Three in $215 Million Email Fraud Scheme Targeting 1,000+ Victims...
New Footage Appears to Show Would-Be Trump Assassin Shooting U.S. Secret Service Agent
DOJ Opens Civil Rights Probes Into 36 Illinois School Districts Over Gender, Sexuality...
Biden-Appointed Judge Orders Release of Illegal Alien Wanted for Murder in Dominican Repub...
Wait, Did an Illegal Alien Make a Meth Lab in This Michigan College...
Detroit Man to Stand Trial for Allegedly Stealing 12 Identities to Pocket $400K...
Ohio Mother and Daughter Allegedly Abused Government Jobs to Steal Nearly $2 Million...
Tipsheet

Los Angeles County Seal's Tiny Cross Ruled Unconstitutional

Los Angeles County Seal's Tiny Cross Ruled Unconstitutional

A judge has ruled that the tiny cross on top of the San Gabriel Mission, pictured in the official seal of Los Angeles County, is unconstitutional. The San Gabriel Mission is one of the oldest buildings in Los Angeles County.

Advertisement

A decade earlier, the county had removed a cross from the seal — this one shown floating above the Hollywood Bowl — after being threatened with a similar lawsuit. The proponents of reinstating the cross on the seal argued it was needed to make the image of the mission historically and architecturally accurate. When the seal was redesigned in 2004, there was no cross on top of the mission, as it had gone missing during earthquake retrofitting. The cross was later restored atop the building.

In a 55-page ruling released Thursday, U.S. District Judge Christina A. Snyder wrote that the addition of the cross ”carries with it an aura of prestige, authority, and approval. By singling out the cross for addition to the seal, the county necessarily lends its prestige and approval to a depiction of one faith’s sectarian imagery.

“The county also provides a platform for broadcasting that imagery on county buildings, vehicles, flags, and stationary.… Permitting such a change and the associated expenditure of public funds places the county’s power, prestige, and purse behind a single religion, Christianity, without making any such benefit available on an equal basis to those with secular objectives or alternative sectarian views."

Advertisement

This is absurd. The building in question is an important part of the history of Los Angeles, and it has a cross on it. This is not the government endorsing one religion over another. If the first building built in the county were a mosque, synagogue, or whatever, that would be reflected as such in the seal. It's historical accuracy, not saying one religion is better than another.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement