The Trump Team Got a Serious Briefing on the 2026 Midterms This Week....
The Trans Ice Rink Shooter Story Just Took a Wild Turn
DC Water CEO: 'We Had Too Many White Men in Charge'
Here's the One Word That Describes US Women's Hockey at the Winter Olympics...
Supreme Court Orders CNN to Respond
The Supreme Court Just Issued Their Ruling on President Trump's Tariffs
California Judge Orders Children's Hospital to Continue 'Gender-Affirming Surgeries' for M...
Susan Rice's Terrifying Vow If Democrats Take Back Power
To the Democrats' Dismay, the List of Hospitals Ending 'Gender-Affirming Surgeries' for Mi...
Democrats Go Blue in Profane Anti-Trump Illinois Senate Campaign Ad
The Democrats Just Picked the Worst Person to Give Their Response to the...
Wisconsin's Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos Will Not Seek Reelection
Calling the SAVE Act 'Jim Crow' Is an Insult to History
Republican Steve Hilton Surges to the Lead in California Gubernatorial Race
Transparency Is Public Safety: Medicaid Oversight and Honest Governance Matter
Tipsheet

Apple Asked to Break Into San Bernardino Terrorists' iPhone

Apple Asked to Break Into San Bernardino Terrorists' iPhone

I wrote a few days ago about how the FBI still hadn't been able unlock the iPhone used by Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the terrorists who killed 14 people in an attack on December 2 in San Bernardino, CA. Now, a judge has ordered Apple to unlock the phone so that its contents can be examined. A current security feature would erase the contents of the phone if the wrong password is entered too many times.

Advertisement

The ruling from U.S. Magistrate Sheri Pym requires Apple to provide "reasonable technical assistance" to the FBI, namely, software that can disable the security feature that erases data from the iPhone after too many unsuccessful attempts to unlock it.

Federal prosecutors told the court they could not access the phone used by Farook because they don’t know his passcode. With the security feature disabled, they can attempt as many combinations necessary to unlock the iPhone.

The iPhone in this case was not the property of Farook, but of his employer, San Bernardino County, which consented to the search.

While I agree that the phone should definitely be examined as to better find out what the terrorists were doing in their final days, I also agree that there are legitimate concerns with setting this kind of precedent. There's nothing to stop someone from lifting the "master key" unlock program and violating everyone's privacy. Now, granted, this is definitely an unusual case, but it will be very interesting to see if Apple complies with the demand.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement