NRSC Rolls Out New Ad Slamming Bernie Sanders' Unholy Left-Wing Crusade
Sheriff Facing 30 Felony Counts After Ten Inmates Pull Off Massive Jailbreak
Black Voters Just Gave the Democratic Party Some Horrible News
Will Trump Endorse Anyone in Texas GOP Senate Runoff?
AOC Predicts Gerrymandering War Between Blue and Red States
Tim Walz Doesn't Seem to Object to Graham Platner's Use of This Word...
Vote Blue No Matter Who? We Did Nazi That Coming
Joe Biden Throws His Support Behind Keisha Lance Bottoms for GA Governor
Scott Jennings Calls Out Seth Moulton for Suggesting Secretary Hegseth Be Executed for...
Gavin Newsom Has Some Audacity Complaining About Gas Prices
Can We Save Hollywood? CA Republican Steve Hilton Believes He Can
Here Is Ron DeSantis' 'Cheat Code' to Good Governance
Scott Bessent Reveals the True State of Iran Amid the US Blockade
As Desperation Grows, Iran Considers Deploying Explosive Dolphins Against US Blockade
Romanian National Sentenced to 28 Months for SNAP Benefits Skimming Conspiracy
Tipsheet

Apple Asked to Break Into San Bernardino Terrorists' iPhone

Apple Asked to Break Into San Bernardino Terrorists' iPhone

I wrote a few days ago about how the FBI still hadn't been able unlock the iPhone used by Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the terrorists who killed 14 people in an attack on December 2 in San Bernardino, CA. Now, a judge has ordered Apple to unlock the phone so that its contents can be examined. A current security feature would erase the contents of the phone if the wrong password is entered too many times.

Advertisement

The ruling from U.S. Magistrate Sheri Pym requires Apple to provide "reasonable technical assistance" to the FBI, namely, software that can disable the security feature that erases data from the iPhone after too many unsuccessful attempts to unlock it.

Federal prosecutors told the court they could not access the phone used by Farook because they don’t know his passcode. With the security feature disabled, they can attempt as many combinations necessary to unlock the iPhone.

The iPhone in this case was not the property of Farook, but of his employer, San Bernardino County, which consented to the search.

While I agree that the phone should definitely be examined as to better find out what the terrorists were doing in their final days, I also agree that there are legitimate concerns with setting this kind of precedent. There's nothing to stop someone from lifting the "master key" unlock program and violating everyone's privacy. Now, granted, this is definitely an unusual case, but it will be very interesting to see if Apple complies with the demand.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos