Trump Sends a Warning to Iran
Trump Effectively Calls on Saudi Arabia to Recognize Israel
Did Hakeem Jeffries Just Threaten Federal Law Enforcement?
All Is Not Well in Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's District
Federal Judge Just Handed Trump a Huge Win. Here's What It Means for...
Republicans Control the House – So Why Did They Just Cave on Gun...
Oklahoma Passes Measure That Could Make Public Buildings Much Safer
Top GOP Members of Congress Call for Destruction of Hamas
Texas Senate Approves Pro-Life Monument Honoring Unborn at State Capitol in Bold Stand...
First-in-the-Nation: U.S. Indicts Sinaloa Cartel Leaders for Narco-Terrorism
RFK Jr.: European Price-Fixing Led to Trump Pharmaceutical EO
Planned Parenthood’s Latest Annual Report Is Out. They Took in More Money and...
GOP Senator Weighs in on Gift of Qatari Jet to Trump
Washington State Attacks the Seal of Confession
By the Way, Yet Another Congressional Aide Was Victimized by Crime in DC
Tipsheet

NARAL Colorado Not Fans of Bill That Would Criminalize the Murder of a Fetus

The nation was stunned by the vicious assault on Michelle Wilkins, a 26-year-old woman in Colorado whose unborn child was ripped from her womb while she answered a Craigslist ad for baby clothes. Even though her unborn child was killed in the attack, the attacker, Dynel Lane, would not face murder charges as it was uncertain whether or not the infant was alive outside of the womb. People were furious with this development, and a YouGov poll showed that vast majorities of people say that they feel the attack should have been classified as a murder. Colorado's legislature is considering the "Crimes Against Pregnant Women Act," which would allow for murder charges to be filed in a case like the attack on Wilkins.

Advertisement

Apparently the people of NARAL Colorado are not among the 76 percent who think that the attack was more than an assault. Earlier today, they tweeted this:

Call me crazy, but I'm not seeing how this is exactly a bad thing. Even trying to see the bill from the point of view held by NARAL's employees, I'm at a loss as to how someone could be against a murder charge for someone who literally ripped open a woman's body to extract her baby during an assault. This isn't even close to the same thing as a woman going in for an abortion--this was an assault that resulted in the death of a person.

NARAL Colorado followed up their tweet with this one, which didn't do much to explain their point of view:

Again, this simply isn't true. Wilkins' infant was seven months along, and had the baby been born in a hospital instead of in a bathtub following a botched Cesarian section, he would probably still be alive today. Despite this life that was snuffed out, Lane won't be charged with murder because Colorado law won't allow this. That's absurd.

Advertisement

It's also interesting that NARAL chose to use the term "mother" in their first tweet. What, pray tell, is the woman a mother of if (in NARAL's view) they are not a person until they are born?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement