Oh, Here's Another Policy Abigail Spanberger and VA Dems Support That Screws Over...
So, That New VA Congressional Map That Dems Want Could Get Tossed
Trump Just Won Huge Concession From Iranian Regime
Supreme Court to Hear Colorado Religious Freedom Case
Rabid Animal Rights Activists Swarm Beagle Research Facility to Steal Dogs
This Bill Would Create 'Homelessness Courts' and Ban Camping on Public Property
Trump Just Went Scorched Earth on Supreme Court Over Recent Rulings
Democrats and the Media Go to Bat for the Southern Poverty Law Center
Suspect Who Killed DHS Employee in Georgia Crime Spree Found Dead in His...
Gun Control Calls Follow Shreveport Shooting, but There's an Issue
Europe Gathers to Plan Securing the Strait of Hormuz—Once the United States Finishes...
Longtime Georgia Democrat, Congressman David Scott, Dies at 80
Iran State Media and Officials Are Reportedly Ready for the War to Resume
Victor Davis Hanson Says Iran Is Running Out of Time
Here's What Iran Is Up to After President Trump Extended the Ceasefire
Tipsheet

NARAL Colorado Not Fans of Bill That Would Criminalize the Murder of a Fetus

NARAL Colorado Not Fans of Bill That Would Criminalize the Murder of a Fetus

The nation was stunned by the vicious assault on Michelle Wilkins, a 26-year-old woman in Colorado whose unborn child was ripped from her womb while she answered a Craigslist ad for baby clothes. Even though her unborn child was killed in the attack, the attacker, Dynel Lane, would not face murder charges as it was uncertain whether or not the infant was alive outside of the womb. People were furious with this development, and a YouGov poll showed that vast majorities of people say that they feel the attack should have been classified as a murder. Colorado's legislature is considering the "Crimes Against Pregnant Women Act," which would allow for murder charges to be filed in a case like the attack on Wilkins.

Advertisement

Apparently the people of NARAL Colorado are not among the 76 percent who think that the attack was more than an assault. Earlier today, they tweeted this:

Call me crazy, but I'm not seeing how this is exactly a bad thing. Even trying to see the bill from the point of view held by NARAL's employees, I'm at a loss as to how someone could be against a murder charge for someone who literally ripped open a woman's body to extract her baby during an assault. This isn't even close to the same thing as a woman going in for an abortion--this was an assault that resulted in the death of a person.

NARAL Colorado followed up their tweet with this one, which didn't do much to explain their point of view:

Again, this simply isn't true. Wilkins' infant was seven months along, and had the baby been born in a hospital instead of in a bathtub following a botched Cesarian section, he would probably still be alive today. Despite this life that was snuffed out, Lane won't be charged with murder because Colorado law won't allow this. That's absurd.

Advertisement

Related:

COLORADO

It's also interesting that NARAL chose to use the term "mother" in their first tweet. What, pray tell, is the woman a mother of if (in NARAL's view) they are not a person until they are born?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement