We Have the Results of Trump's Cognitive Score
Why the Washington Nationals Just Fired One of Their Executives. Hint: It's Woke...
Japan Overhauled Its Entire Intelligence Community...and One Nation Is Not Happy About It
NY Gov Tried to Dunk on Trump About the Knicks, and Failed Miserably
Francesca Hong Envisions a World Without Prisons, and She Wants to Be Wisconsin's...
Weren't Democrats Opposed to 'Christian Nationalism'?
Illegal Alien Sentenced to Nearly 3 Years for 20-Year Identity Theft, Benefits and...
White House Calls NYT Report on Vance Social Media Advice 'Complete Fake News'
The Nazi Tattoo, the Reddit Posts, and Now This: Graham Platner's Senate Campaign...
NJ Man Charged After Allegedly Biting, Kicking ICE Officers at Newark Detention Facility
James Talarico's Campaign Website Reveals His Radical Immigration Desires
Stephen Colbert's Failed Comedy Act Was Bleeding CBS Dry
EXCLUSIVE: James Talarico's Influence Helped Secure His Vegan Girlfriend a Tax-Payer Funde...
EXCLUSIVE: Karen Bass Is in 'Serious Jeopardy' of Losing Mayoral Race, Poll Suggests
United Flight Forced to Land After Attempted Hijacking
Tipsheet

IRS' New Front in the War on Administration Critics

IRS' New Front in the War on Administration Critics

On Friday, the IRS is scheduled to release rules that would significantly impact the rights of social welfare groups -- like Tea Party groups -- to participate in the political process. The IRS is attempting to sell the rules as a way to define more objectively how and whether these groups are engaging in political activity that would affect their tax status, but the truth is that it's little more than another way the Obama administration is trying to silence its critics.

Advertisement

As USA Today puts it:

IRS officials told congressional investigators that they applied a "facts and circumstances" test to decide whether activities were political. The proposed rules would replace that test with more objective criteria.

So, for example, any mention of a candidate within 60 days of a general election would be considered political, regardless of the context. The rule would even apply to mentions of a candidate that happened before the 60-day window, but which remained on an organization's website. But it wouldn't apply to third-party comments on the same site.

[C]onservatives argue that the rules would force groups engaging in constitutionally protected speech to disclose their donors, exposing them to political harassment. "With this move, the Obama administration opens a new front in its war against political dissent," he said.

But the issue isn't speech, watchdog groups say. It's about disclosure.

The proposal "provides hope that the IRS is going to shut down a huge loophole that has allowed political organizations to spend hundreds of millions of dollars without disclosing their donors," said Paul Ryan, senior counsel with the Campaign Legal Center, which has sued the IRS to clamp down on the political activity of tax-exempt groups.

Advertisement

In general, the right doesn't bully and harass those who hold political views that are different from theirs. They don't "organize" and Republican elected officials don't seek to ban a business because they disagree with the views of its owner. Those are some of the reasons that conservative groups welcome an opportunity to contribute to groups or causes they believe in without having to be threatened.

The point of the IRS regulations is to make this more difficult for conservatives, and limit their ability to oppose the administration in particular and liberalism in general. It's a continuation of the agency's war on administration critics.

And it's wrong.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement